Yes and no. It’s relevant if Hillary wants to assume the mantle of champion of women in the war against sexual harassment, rape, and objectification. Her comment “Women should be believed” opened her up to this scrutiny. And it’s not just Bill. As I pointed out, she’s pretty soft on bad conduct when it’s anyone she’s friends with. And given how powerful her friends are, it matters if she tolerates bad behavior.
adaher: Bill Clinton is a sex-slaving pedophile and Hillary looked the other way, and when the public finds out they’re going to be sent to federal prison and it will destroy the Democratic Party forever and ever and ever. <strokes nipples>
anyone with a brain: Yeah, that’s not going to happen and you’re full of shit.
adaher: Ooh, looks like I struck a nerve! Umadbros? Clintons… mmmm… Democrats… oooooooh… mmmmm… oh Mommy… Mommy I’m coming!!! <girlish squeal>
awab: Ick.
foolsguinea: I’ll have what he’s having!
Well, actually I said that Clinton isn’t on trial here. You’re completely letting the point fly over your heads, probably intentionally.
How will it LOOK to the voting public when Clinton’s more recent post-Presidential escapades get wide coverage?
How would it look if you didn’t lie and embellish and actually fact checked your own posts?
And you accuse me of changing the subject? You’ve been trying to avoid this subject for hours by quibbling over small details, like I’m in an interrogation room and you’re a cop. You made your case that I lied and exaggerated and I rebutted. The outcome of that little discussion has no bearing on what will actually happen to the Clintons once the media stops focusing on Donald Trump.
What happened before Trump caught fire is just a small taste of what’s coming. Every journalist in America that isn’t a Clinton supporter is looking for the scoop that will bring her campaign down. It’s a target rich environment.
You mean the story about him NOT having sex with a couple of prostitutes? You’re right - how will Hillary’s campaign ever recover?
You can try to spin it that way. Good luck. Clinton sure had a great time partying with Epstein’s sex slaves. Never said a word either. Guess he just didn’t want to know. After all, Epstein was donating a lot of money.
It’s not spin. It’s an accurate description of events. Bill Clinton didn’t have sex with any of the girls, whatever their age, according to your own cite (the witness in the Daily Mail.)
But sure, keep talking about how Bill* didn’t* have sex with anyone. It’s probably just the break that JEB! needs. What a bombshell!
No he did not. Where your spin comes in is acting as if that’s the whole story, and not Clinton’s notorious carousing with scuzbuckets in his post Presidential years. This is a guy that he had to know was a monster and he just didn’t care. As Roberts said, there’s just no way Clinton didn’t know what was going on unless he was willfully avoiding wanting to know. You know, maybe averting his eyes from those naked pictures of barely legal(and possibly not legal) girls.
And cut foolsguinea some slack. Foolsguinea is nowhere near my level of stridency and I’m sure doesn’t endorse my arguments beyond the most broad part of it(that Clinton’s escapades pose problems for Hillary, something which really isn’t controversial unless you’re in denial).
Do you have any idea how the real world works? How does the presence of pictures of naked girls (which exist in a pretty high percentage of the homes I’ve visited) = knowledge of underage prostitutes? Do you really think only child molesters have pictures of naked people in their homes?
Trump quote on Jeff Epstein in 2002:
"I’ve known Jeff for fifteen years. Terrific guy,‘’ Trump told New York Magazine back in 2002. “He’s a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side. No doubt about it — Jeffrey enjoys his social life.”
Ouch. So you’re hoping for an auto-Bobbitt?
The sweaty desperation and impotent rage of the rightwing has them reaching for anything now.
It’s going to get worse. A lot worse.
Sure is fun to watch, though.
Doesn’t surprise me at all. I am disappointed in Dershowitz though. I actually expected better of him.
Clinton is a net asset to humanity. You are not.
And I disagree with you, because you are unable to honestly advocate for your positions.
So, something a candidate’s husband did is going to keep her out of the White House? And “wreck Democrats”? Do you honestly not recognize massive wishful thinking when you do it? You’re like my friends that were sure that Obama’s mistress was going to come forward right before the '08 election. That was a fact, and they were bitterly disappointed when it didn’t happen.
Here’s more free advice (that I occasionally take):
Y’know, I’m fairly brilliant (citation needed) but I’m not the smartest person on these boards, and neither are you. So why don’t we stop spewing a lot of opinions and “facts” we wish were true?
If we shut up and listen (and maybe spend all that free time we’ve saved checking our facts), we might learn things instead of making ourselves more mocked and dismissed with each post.
I haven’t read this thread. I don’t want to read this thread. And I really don’t want my eyeballs assaulted by BILL CLINTON’S PENIS every time I open the damn forum.
So would y’all mind wrapping it up and letting the thread drop so I don’t have to look at it any more.
Many thanks.
No! Bill Clinton’s penis will be with you always!