THAT WAS MY POINT. (Or maybe it wasn’t, but it should have been.)
And finally the OP may sink in. Bill Clinton’s penis is popular. Bill Clinton was a mediocre President for a moderate, and a sellout for a liberal.* But his sexual exploits have (apparently) made him a rock star in voters’ minds. *Despite the fact that his sexual exploits weren’t really anything that amazing or studly. He was mostly a pathetic grabby boss whose greatest success in the White House was when he found a homely intern willing to settle for oral.
I’m not sure where anyone gets the idea that WJC was a liberal president. He was a NOT-REPUBLICAN, and that’s something I’ve resigned myself to being the best we can hope for, at least for a few more terms.
But see, that’s the irony. The very things that we were willing to overlook when Clinton was President are a lot harder to overlook when he’s just roaming the White House looking for college girls to diddle.
Unless he’s some kind of superman then I assume his Libido has somewhat ebbed in the last 20 years. He’ll be 70 next year when his Penis moves into the white house. Even Hugh Hefner slowed down with age.
Apparently some bitter republicans who haven’t been laid in the last 20 years think this. They’re still obsessing over Bill Clintons Penis after all this time.
Fantasy-liberals think this. I learn stuff about fantasy-world-liberals from Dopers all the time. You’ll never believe what those idiot fantasy-world-libs believe… what a bunch of jackasses they are, living in their fantasy/not-real world!
I recognize that this is an opinion, and of course you’re welcome to it. But I also don’t know who, apart from a small population of dudebros I suppose, believes this.
I’m quite willing to entertain the possibility that Bill Clinton is a rapist. It isn’t proven, but if it were proven, I can’t really say I’d be surprised.
It’s not going to stop me from supporting Hillary for president, though.
Several op-eds about Clinton in the media the last few days from major columnists: Ruth Marcus went so far as concede that the criticism of Clinton is valid, and we already know what Maureen Dowd thinks.