Interesting. Looking back a ways (my dating days being a whole lotta years behind me, now) I’d have to agree with iampunha. It really is an individual thing.
I dated three virgins, that I’m positive about, at least. Without getting into the lurid details, the very first one and I lost our virginity together, one wasn’t even interested in fooling around, and the third wanted to wait for marriage, as far as actual coitus goes. Out of a sample group of three, I think I covered all the bases.
[sub]No pun intended.[/sub]
I felt pretty much the same emotionally towards all three, so I’d say, no, it’s not a dealbreaker. I was interested in, and involved with, all three of them before the subject of sex beyond “making out” was ever discussed. (We’re talking high school years here, though. Give that what weight you will.)
I’ll admit that the second time was the shortest of the three relationships. I was young, dumb, and had a lot more active hormones than she did, I guess. But I didn’t date her for a week, then kick her to the curb when she wouldn’t put out, either.
Being experienced, and being good at it, for lack of a better term, are not mutually inclusive. I can only speak for m’self, but my excitement at the idea of sex with someone was based a lot more on how attracted I was to her (emotionally, physically etc etc) than on how good or bad she might potentially be at the act.
Consider too the old gag, “Even the worst sex is still pretty damn good.”
Is this helping, or even making sense, at all?