Hey Pharm Boy

Well, you DID say there were no consequences for your actions in the part of your post I quoted…and since you did make a reference in the original thread to tops wanting to be your bottom, I assumed that you were engaging in anal sex, though I guess that’s not necessarily true.

I’m sorry about saying that part about your wanting to increase AIDS research funding, I based that on PharmBoy’s post, I assumed he was referring to something you said in another thread. I retract my hypocrisy accusations, in relation to that.

  1. This is the pit.

  2. Yes, they stepped on a nerve. But of course, you probably don’t see why. Though as this is your first post in this thread as far as I can see, not to mention the originating thread, I wonder why you’ve crawled out of the woodwork to inject yourself into this debate.

  3. Here’s your response, smart ass. Enjoy.

***Originally posted by Hastur *

  1. This is the pit.**

Yes, it is. But that merely means vitriol is permitted, not that it is required.

And while I’m not sufficiently familiar with Lynn Bodoni to know how much it takes to make said administrator chime in with a request to tone things down, it does give one pause.

2) Yes, they stepped on a nerve. But of course, you probably don’t see why. Though as this is your first post in this thread as far as I can see, not to mention the originating thread, I wonder why you’ve crawled out of the woodwork to inject yourself into this debate.

I’ll admit to being a generally low-key poster, but can lay claim to one other post in this thread (on the first page) and one in the originating thread.

I understand the original gripe, although my view is that if PharmBoy was intending to make a homophobic comment, it was a pretty lame one (for comparison, I used to moderate on a discussion list visited by Ben Phelps (grandson of Fred) and one Charles Hockenbarger of the same so-called church – now there was some vile homophobic spewings) and if it was a troll, it was still pretty lame and yet somehow succeeded beyond his wildest expectations.

I just assumed it was someone trying to express a view about promiscuity but who did so in such a clumsy manner as to offend everyone in the process. Perhaps he should plead inanity.

If there is some history of acrimony between you and PharmBoy and/or Ryan that I don’t know about, then obviously there may be reasons for your anger beyond this immediate context. But I still haven’t seen anything here to justify it.

But, as you say, this is the Pit.

And this is just one man’s view.

And yet somehow I still managed to express it without resorting to obscenities.

3) Here’s your response, smart ass. Enjoy.

I’ll have it framed for my wall. :slight_smile:

Where did the word “important” come from? It’s strange how when people quote me, words seem to just pop out of nowhere. I certainly could accuse you of ignoring advice on avoiding cancer. Whether or not it is important advice is a subjective matter.

That would be PharmBoy, yes?
[/QUOTE]

Where?

'Scuse me -->dodges flaming gouts of napalm<-- isn’t there room for common sense here?

There have been a lot of, shall we graphic? sexual threads lately. They’ve run the gamut from licking, sucking and finally ran aground in Scylla’s magnificent serio-comic parody about diaper changing. Know what? In all those threads I don’t recall a single mention of safe sex, AIDS or morals. Not one.

Now I find that interesting. The only qualititative difference is that Esprix’s OP was specifically gay. Not suprising, because he is gay and is happy with it. Plenty of gay posters contributed to the other sex threads, but somehow Exprix has been singled out, possibly because he originated the thread. I dunno.

Hell will freeze over before you see me contributing personal information in a sex thread. That’s just me. Do I look down on people who can and do participate? Hell, no. In a lot of ways I envy their freedom and confidence. Differences keep life interesting and oddly enough, I’m frequently wrong on all kinds of things. But those threads are well identified up front and I know damned well what’s in them before I read them.

A certain hypocrisy has crept into the mix here. If frank discussion of sexuality offends you, don’t read the threads. If you do choose to read them, remember it’s your choice. If you must judge others, then keep the criteria consistent. If you still insist on passing judgment, know you’re picking a very personal fight and put on your asbestos undies.

People choose to share intensely personal information sometimes. But judging others is also a personal choice. Best keep in mind you’re gonna get judged right back.

Veb

Excellent observation - I’m surprised I didn’t catch that. Seems that the gay guys always have to have safe sex and/or AIDS and/or a different sent of morality attached to them in some way. Goodness forbid we just have fun like everybody else… :rolleyes:

Esprix

Yeah, but I’m still legitimately pissed off. esprix’s getting some. I’m just changing diapers.

Exactly! You said in a few words what I wandered around trying to get at. Two issues: judging at all, and judging fairly.

Thanks for the catch, Exprix. Honestly, the only non-prescription drug I’m using is Sudafed. (Colds are another disease that don’t discriminate.) What’s sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander. Dander. Drake. Covey! Gosling. Swarm. Parliament? Hectare. (damn)

Maybe it’s fever-clarity, but this just seems like something simple being made artifically complicated. Fair’s fair and don’t be a jerk.

Veb

I think the reason Esprix’s thread was singled out was not so much that he is gay, but the fact he was bragging about having sex with 9 different people in a relatively short period of time. Most of the explicit sex threads I have read are talking about specific sex acts, and do not specify how many people the poster has performed them on in the last week. I also have not seen any threads, other than Esprix’s, where the poster is claiming to have sex with multiple people in a short time, though I’m not saying there aren’t any.

I think you are confusing concern over an amount of sex partners with sexual prudishness, otherwise I can’t see why you would see a correlation between Esprix’s original post and the various ‘So I was eating my wife’s pussy…’ threads. I don’t see anything wrong with any sex act, though there are of course some I have no interest in performing. I don’t have a problem with people practicing unsafe sex. The part I had a problem with was someone talking about what I saw as unsafe sexual behavior and then stating that there were no possible consequences for it.

Sorry, I can’t agree.
People were detailing sexual acts but never was it asked, “oh, and how long did you know this person? please footnote your relationship when you learned technique X. What precautions did you take? What sexual partners may have preceded you?”

Read the posts. Not once was morality or responsibility even mentioned. Some very graphic stuff indeed, obviously with poster identify attached; gay, straight and bi, with promiscuity often implied and sometimes stated. But condemnation didn’t start until Esprix started a thread that was served as the lightning rod. So to speak.

You can’t pick and choose condemnations. It’s patently unfair to single out Esprix. Open a sex thread; there are plenty to choose from. It’s unfair to raise the bar for one while using a “don’t ask; don’t tell” policy for others.

I’m of the “if they don’t do it in the streets and scare the horses it’s none of my business” school of thought.

Veb

well I was gonna come in with a factual response… on why PharmBoy is wrong and why his spewing of unfactual information ammounts to bigotry, I still will. But, I just wanted to agree with Esprix and Tveblen in fact I started a thread very like that a while back. No responses like that. So it appears they are right.

And when I voice my opinion, Hasty ol’ pal, you’ll be the first to know.

I pointed out a couple facts, namely:

Fact 1: You voiced your opinion against people being judgemental.

Fact 2: Later on, you acted judgemental.

I don’t see what’s so hard about that to figure out. I especially don’t see why you feel the need to constantly point to Pharmboy’s post and say “See? See?!? He did it first!” I said nothing about Pharmboy. I just was just confused about your animosity-induced judging of the concept of marriage.

Anyway, since it’s been four posts and you’ve still proven yourself unable to address my point, I think I’ll just drop the matter. After all, I played the “Watch Hastur try to type a creative insult” game once before, and it was about as interesting as watching a drunken, castrated monkey try to masturbate.

I’m sure nobody will appreciate this intrusion, but since it’s popping up so often: ONE “E” IN “JUDGMENT!”

-The Canadian Oxford Dictionary

You have no point to address, other than the one on your head. You, as usual, don’t know what the hell you are talking about, and are trying to bullshit your way into seeming coherent and correct. Find someone else to bother.
You are tiresome and boring.

Interesting…Coldfire asks Esprix if he wants the original thread closed, Esprix apparently doesn’t, and then Coldfire closes it anyway.

What about it?

Why wasn’t it moved to The Pit like the Billy Joel thread?

I already sent Coldfire my objection privately, but you know what? It’s his call. I don’t run this board, and I’m willing to abide by his decision (and that of any other Mod or Admin). If anybody really wants to know that much about my sex life, I’ll start another thread in a more appropriate forum, or I’ll keep it private.

Esprix

Thanks for understanding, Esprix - and you’ve got mail. :slight_smile:

Badtz, one of the reasons for closing it was the fact that two (semi) related threads were already in full progress in the Pit. Adding another one would have gotten me in some serious trouble with my colleagues…