[QUOTE=Jodi]
I personally don’t see how a “good and kind” Christian could feel “distain or disgust” for someone just for not following Biblical principles closely enough. I will grant you that there are many of that stripe of fundie Christian around, but you do them more credit than they deserve to consider their worldview either “good” or “kind.” And the concept of sin does not require “a belief that living outside of a rigid set of rules is openly defying a jealous and angry Being, and is punishable by eternal damnation.” I don’t believe that, and I’m a pretty mainstream moderate Christian. Specifically, I don’t believe the parts about “rigid set of rules,” “openly defying,” “jealous and angry Being,” and “eternal damnation” – so, basically, all of it. 
But “sin” and “hell” are not the same as, not inconsistent with, and not replaceable by “orientation,” “freedom of choice,” and “social and personal consequences.” So, again, you must be defining the terms in some manner other than how they are generally defined in order to make those replacements.
It seems to me that more than arguing that you wouldn’t consider dating someone who acknowledged the concepts of sin and hell, you actually would not date someone who was rigid and intolerant in their understanding of these concepts, and who was willing to sit in judgment by applying them to his or her fellow men. Perhaps that is not your position, in which case I apologize for misrepresenting it, but if that is your positin, I have absolutely no problem with it. I think it’s a very fair one and it happens to be one I share, even as I believe in sin if not hell.
[/QUOTE]
Maybe we should start another thread to discuss the meanings of sin and Hell- but I want to clarify exactly why I agree with the OP when he says that discussions of sin and Hell cross a line.
To me, the reason that I equate sin and Hell with hate speech is because I do not feel that these concepts fairly assess or measure another human being. The Ten Commandments and many other Biblical rules of conduct do include what most people consider lawful behavior (thou shalt not kill and steal) regardless of religious afflation. I don’t disagree with these commandments- following them makes one a good citizen. But the same weight and threat of punishment is given to matters of thought control: belief that Jesus Christ died to absolve your bad behavior, sexual orientation, and whether or not you choose to perform work on a Sunday. In order to get into Heaven (and avoid eternal damnation) you must agree that Jesus Christ is the son of God, you mustn’t desire someone of the same sex; you mustn’t desire your neighbor’s wife, etc.
For me, the choice to date someone of another belief system still boils down to a person’s overall degree of judgmental behavior. I could not fully love or respect someone who feels certain that homosexuals or people of the Jewish faith are destined for eternal torment. For me at least, belief in a kind and benevolent unseen force is not a deal breaker. But predicting and prescribing eternal damnation for thoughts and actions that differ from your own: is.
Ultimately I believe that people of all manner of religion and philosophies should interact, date, and marry if the relationship is healthy. Anything less is segregation.