I’ll dive back into the fray. I’ve written variations on this post a couple times then not pressed “Submit” for fear of fanning the flames.
In person, I only vent like this to friends and this board (I suppose I count you in the “friend” column). In court, I intend to be all business. I have 5 months of checking account records (she used our old joint account for a long time) and 14 months of credit card statements in a folder. If she goes to court and cries poverty, I think I can prove why - and it’s not that she didn’t have enough money, it’s that she wasted, literally, thousands of dollars on fast food and luxury services.
I have the figures covered I think.
If she runs to court and cries ignorance, I have a many emails from me to her detailing the split of our debts and assets and preparing for the legal separation papers. I have her signature on the divorce and separation papers that reflect all the previous emails. All are consistent.
I worry most about her hints that she’s going to try to take away my kids.
I could try to make the argument that she’s not that good a mother. I have pictures of how she kept house (although the obvious counter-argument is that I lived there too), papers on how she manages money. Her immoral behavior since the separation (multiple live-in boyfriends, one a thief) is basically inadmissible.
I was told my a family lawyer, earlier when I was considering trying for full custody, that unless she’s a drug abuser, alcoholic, or child abuser that I couldn’t expect more than half custody. I’m hoping that rather liberal list of guidelines applies to me if she tries to take the kids away. I do have friends we used to have in common who are willing to stand up in court and vouch for me - don’t know if that’ll be a help or not.
I guess what I’m trying to say is if this ends up back in court, I have facts and not emotions to argue with. I can be a cold-hearted bastard when I argue. I can be annoyingly Mr-Spock logical at times. After court, though, it’s likely I’ll have to have shot and a big bowl of ice cream because the emotionalism is only deferred.
I guess I’m going to handle my “motion to enforce” on my own. It seems cut-and-dried, again I have my figures and papers ready and all I’m requesting is enforcement of the written decree. If it gets to the point that we’re going back for a motion to modify the decree, though, I’m going to get a lawyer.
As to doing everything through a lawyer - that’s impractical concerning immediate issues with the children. In the past two days, we’ve exchange emails over last night’s visitation with me and my time with them Sunday. Pick-up and drop-off locations and times have to managed. It sounds good to say “Do everything through lawyers” but it’s not really practical.
My latest email to her was about child custody changes. She has a new job, greatly increased salary, and the law says if it results in a 10% change in CS payments, then a change to CS is allowed.
There’s two processes, one where she cooperates, one when she doesn’t. The former is easier and cheaper, the latter is harder and more expensive. I sent her an email saying I intend to modify the CS, I linked to the court instructions, and asked her, basically, “hard or easy?”
No answer yet. I don’t expect one, her latest thing is playing passive aggressive. I told her that not answering by Monday means “the hard way”. And it’s back to legal services I go.
I have a notebook now to record all my dealings with her. I’m sure it’s going to get full.