See, there’s a reasoning problem here.
OP: I don’t like the way people treat me b/c I’m fat.
Poster A: People are assholes. If you don’t like being fat, then lost weight! Duh!
OP: I don’t like the way I’m characterized b/c I’m blonde.
Poster A: People are assholes. If you don’t like being blonde, then dye your hair! Duh!
OP: I don’t like the way people act like I’m a soccer mom or a bad driver just b/c I love driving my SUV.
Poster A: Well, that’s how people are… if you don’t like it, maybe you should have bought a sedan instead! Duh!
This line of thinking presupposes that people should change and that prejudice is fixed. I disagree. The line of thought should start with breaking down prejudice, and accepting people as they are. This sort of thing doesn’t exist solely in terms of weight (which can be conveniently classified as a health issue rather than stereotype) but other things as well.
<slight technical hijack>
I’m a psych student and, according to Seligman and his learned helplessness research, people who have become emotionally helpless (through one reason or another) rationalize this by beliving that the world is fixed and that there is nothing they can do about it. This isn’t necessarily a “victim” sort of thing, but it is a solid viewpoint that the world is unchangeable. This is part of the definition of helplessness. If the world is unchangeable, that means all change must come from within. While there are plenty of helpful philosophies concerning self-improvement, this isn’t it. Rex is a perfect example. His “scientific” proof to the unattractiveness of women follows that he thinks of the world as completely static, and also his rejection of the idea that “college girls” will ever find him attractive. Men will never find a 200lb person attractive- the world is absolute and unchangeable. Thin girls don’t find fat old me attractive- the world is absolute and unchangeable. etc. etc. The fact that he’s pushed his sexuality to the background means that he is changing himself to conform to his assumptions.
My point? Just that- people who change themselves to conform to assumptions about a static world are the first ones to tell others to do the same. When these posts come up, I wish we could chalk them up to this flawed reasoning and abstain from working ourselves up about them… we’re never going to change the way they think.
</hijack>
If anyone sees glaring errors with the above, well, I’m only a junior. I can try to find online sites/cites for it, but people will learn a lot more by reading the book “Learned Helplessness” by Seligman.
My point? Reason doesn’t work with this sort of thing. We’d probably be best served by just ignoring it.