I’ve never heard of this guy, but apparently his whole thing is saying the quiet part out loud.
Click over to his twitter page and it almost seems like a parody account. Plug his name into google and the results confirm that he’s anti-woman shithead. Like everything about him is so blatantly awful, I didn’t even know which tweets or articles to post here. It’s really bad.
Having said that, I honestly do like the ‘saying the quiet part out loud’ thing and I worry that people will stop doing it. I’d much rather they just came out and told us who they are and what they’re about. Mainly because then it’s a fact. I can look at his twitter page and it’s undeniable that he’s against women. If he just seemed like any other republican, all we can do is infer it from other, typically anti-women, statements (pro-life etc).
Also, I like that it makes it harder for the right to defend their candidate for the same reason. I can point to his own tweets and say ‘see, he said right there he doesn’t want you to be allowed to vote’ instead of ‘well, you see, since he voted against abortion…’.
Her cites, link free and entirely unspecific, are basically: “The Government. Prove me wrong!”
Her audience must be spectacularly stupid. You know, Republicans.
“Start searching on your own” is a great line, because it means that no matter how much you search and fail to find it, the idiot can just claim that you haven’t searched enough.
How about a reply of “I read those studies, they don’t say 70% of women, they say .70% of women, take a look for yourself”. Essentially invoking a version of Cunningham’s Law by purposely using incorrect information so that someone will correct you.