Oh, fuck him sideways with a running rusty chainsaw.
There are days when I daydream about going Maxwell’s silver hammer on a whole lot of deserving people. Although I’m sure there are a few people out there who feel the same about me, so it’s just as well none of us will ever try to make those dreams come true.
And the even funnier thing is, from what I could make of it (from whatever news report I read), the thing he posted was perfectly in keeping with the kind of stuff that one would expect on Trump Social. He got censored (actually, just an added required click-through) by their AI modbots, for no obvious reason.
That said, anyway, . . .
Perhaps because they copied their modbots, along with everything else, and don’t know how to configure them?
Which, if so, is laughably funny, because the whole point of Trump Social is to allow the very kind of right-wing invective that tends to get censored by modbots elsewhere.
I dropped a few words there. The drinking age for the US military is 21, and a number of said service members aged 18 to 20 decide to get lit in town then return to base under the influence.
This is the irony – IME these “free speech” apps are exactly the opposite.
On Rumble, if you post that the 2020 election was fair, you get downvoted and then can no longer post, while people pile on calling you a commie libtard or whatever.
I took a brief hiatus from Straight Dope to engage with a conservative forum, and they had a feature that people could start threads and block specific people from posting in that thread. Pretty quickly I was blocked from most threads. I never called anyone names, or hijacked threads or anything like that, I just gave counter-arguments.
Not going to bother to link to it, but -
Nick “President Trump’s Favorite Author!” Adams on Twitter:
Nick Adams on Twitter LITERALLY ONE MINUTE LATER:
Pick a fucking lane, dude.
That not evidence for the absence of cocaine orgies; it’s merely (additional) evidence that Trey Gowdy is a dork who never gets invited to anything if the inviters can help it.
He writes coloring books?
I’m not sure which thread to put this in, but it works here:
Alex Jones and Roger Stone imply that Kevin McCarthy is gay and living with a man (possibly Frank Luntz).
There’s speculation that this is being used as an attempt to get McCarthy out of the way if the Republicans retake the House and Senate, making it easier to install Trump as the Speaker of the House.
They then state that Biden will either die in office or be 25th Amendment-ed so that Harris can take over, be impeached immediately, and allow Trump to assume the presidency again.
With his AMAZING hairstyles and stellar personality, I’m baffled how he was never invited to these orgies!
Let's remember Trey Gowdy's hair or whatever creature is on top of his head. pic.twitter.com/mhonLEMX9B
— Erick Fernandez (@ErickFernandez) January 31, 2018
Maybe she should ask Matt Gaetz.
A bill before the Tennessee legislature would allow “common law marriage” with no age limit (but only if it’s between “one man” and “one woman”).
Another bill before the Tennessee legislature would toughen residency requirements to run for Congress. A lawsuit is likely to be filed because it would prevent Individual 1’s endorsed candidate, a former Fox analyst, from running.
https://archive.ph/ePGCO
Hey, they’re just trying to Y’all-queda (Christian Taliban/Christian Sharia) the sexual mores of the Old Testament into law. Next thing you know, they’ll make it legal to have “Abrahamic marriage” (i.e. a man marrying his half-sister).
Those idiots really do not know a damn thing about the book they want to enact into law.
My guess is that once they establish this common law marriage thing, they will then try to stop issuing marriage certificates altogether, constructively eliminating gay marriage in the state.
I might be wrong on the specifics, but never forget that they’re playing a long game here.
So if the Supreme Court has ruled that same-sex marriage is a constitutional right, that does not apply to common-law marriages? If the state passes a law recognizing common-law marriages, I would expect that the SC ruling would apply.
Huh. I would have thought a key principle of Obergefell was that a state may not exclude same sex couples from the benefits appertaining to marriage.
ISTM that the point is to get the case before the Supreme Court in the hopes that Loser Donald’s justices will reverse Obergefell.
Okay, that makes total sense in the typical jackass Republican way.