Not only that, but if you read the article the things the author complains about Dolly doing are literally things the Bible says to do, and the things she complains Dolly isn’t doing is stuff that the Bible says not to do.
So Dolly comes out looking good and the author and publication look like they don’t understand the Bible they are so keen to tout. Which they clearly don’t.
You have to understand, these are people who say the late Reverend Fred Rogers was a damaging influence that helped raise a generation of “everyone’s special” softboys.
…
Dolly has gone put of her way to NOT take partisan political sides in everything she does. And they hate that.
Remember how much we used to ridicule the late Jack Chick’s tracts? One of the consistent themes in his glurge was that that the nice, generous, loving, kind, upstanding decent person who was however not the right kind of fundie would wind up in the lake of fire, while the hateful scumbag who just heard of Jesus in page 2 had hit the cosmic jackpot. That is how they are.
If 1)betting were permitted here and 2)anyone here were stupid enough to cover such a bet, I’d wager that the author has, twice with the intention of making it thrice, voted for the orange physical embodiment of all Seven Deadly Sins. (To be fair, I wouldn’t call him a violator of all Ten Commandments, as I very much doubt he has the artistic talent to make even a crude graven image.)
FWIW I was curious enough to do a quick search. I searched for “Wenge lgbtq” and all I turned up were some jewelry/decorative items that happened to use wenge wood.
My impression is that any kind of appropriate wood could have been used in these things and that the Wenge didn’t carry any specific significance.
I assumed that it was just a joke that I didn’t have the context for.