NEW Stupid Republican Idea of the Day (Part 3)

At the event space I work at sometimes the bathroom is arranged with private stalls to do your business and one ante-room where everyone washes up. So far no trans people have attacked anyone.

I wonder how these dudes are going to feel when they’re standing at the urinal and a beautiful woman walks into their restroom.

I’m a cisgender woman but I swear if they pass one of these laws where I live, I’m going to start using the men’s room, and if anyone standing at the urinal questions it I’ll shrug and say “Sorry, just following the law”. What are they going to do, get a subpoena to for my pussy?

And what would Nancy Mace do if, say, Shaun Stinson used the ladies’ restroom like she insists?

Someone like Shaun shouldn’t be using any restroom because they shouldn’t exist at all to people like Nancy.

In the town I live, unisex toilets are becoming the norm. It’s just such a nothing.

I am aware.

I’ve had them in my house for decades. Would recommend. +100

We’re also implementing unisex toilets in the internal bathrooms at all state government offices where I work (where the state actually controls the space; some of our offices have public bathrooms just outside of areas we control which are gender-specific). And as you said, they are not a big deal. The stalls provide enough privacy without needing to separate genders from sharing the bathroom space entirely.

I’d be fully in favor of just making all bathrooms nationwide be unisex. That would end the problem you have where women are lined up outside the women’s room and the men’s room sits unused because guys are able to be in and out quickly.

I’ve been in many smaller public spaces, such as restaurants or convenience stores, where there are only two “one hoss” bathrooms that are single occupancy locked door rooms that have “male” and “female” signage as their only significant differences. The only step to make them unisex would be to change the signs. This could, and should, be done immediately. Who would care? (well, the tighty-righties would care, but I consider that a feature, not a bug. If they complain, they can hold it in until they get home.)

Wa-a-ay back when North Carolina passed one of the first ant-trans bathroom bills I fantasized someone pretty well along in an FtM transition striding into the women’s bathroom saying, “Sorry, ladies but the law says I have to use this one.”

Are you taking bets on that?

They’d figure it was a win-win for them. Either they’re oppressing a transgender person, or they’re getting a look at the girly bits. You’re just not thinking deplorably enough.

And in other news, certain Republicans have figured out that the lame duck period in US governance is kind of stupid:

Doesn’t Starbucks no longer have separate bathrooms? I’m pretty sure that’s the case in Canada. And, just as you say:

The natural history museum I volunteer at has three levels and a pair of segregated bathrooms on each level, stacked atop each other in fact. In addition, off of one of our display galleys on the main floor were a pair of smaller ones, two stalls for the women and a single stall and urinal for the men. During the COVID shutdown they were converted into family bathrooms by putting locks on the doors, the kind showing a red Occupied when thrown.

Sicko!

The cruelty is the point.

How can we have a properly-stratified, properly-apartheid-organized society if people aren’t constantly afraid and miserable?

I wonder if hanging this motto on the walls of classrooms will become mandated, right along with hanging the Ten Commandments?

It certainly would provide useful guidance for young people aspiring to a place in the brave new Trumpist world!

Meanwhile, Congresswoman McBride apparently agrees that she’s a pervert and a man in drag.

Kudos to Ms. McBride for keeping her composure and responding from a place of dignity.
Once again, it’s a homophobic, smooth brained hater making a big deal out of a transgender issue.