Please Join Me for the Pitting of LinusK

The BBQ Pit
321

“bitches at our throats for custody”? No, I don’t know what you’re saying, any more than I knew your earlier fantasy about my being, how would you say it…ah yes, “tickled fucking pink”. Do you realise that you are doing exactly that thing - showing me I am right, that you have no interest in examining the ideas you hold, when it’s so much easier to pretend that anyone who questions those ideas is the bogyman of your imagination, who must be distracted from discussing the flaws of your ideology by any measure…

That impression (evident from your earlier fantasies, from the specific post you reference, and from this post I’m responding to) is confirmed by your determination to avoid discussion of ideas, preferring the playing field of ‘I know a word you didn’t know yet! So your ideas are wrong!’. Which tells us a lot about the thinking that led to the ideas…

You see (you don’t, because you daren’t, but I strive to remain polite), it wasn’t stupid (or even ‘super stupid’, because people are so easily swayed by superlatives, eh?) to point out that your picking, pecking and crowing is indicative of so much.

Here’s a thing, that you just said:
“where you were wrong about the facts”
What a super dishonest thing to say! Or super stupid? Which did you mean me to infer?

if there’s a ‘fact’ in this, it’s that ‘complaisant’ can be found in most dictionaries. You’re right, for all the words I do now, that one was new to me. I do continue to learn - I commend that to you, you should try it. So one ‘fact’ (though not really germane to the ideas, nor properly a fact). Not facts though, of any level of irrelevance or liberality of definition. So was I wrong about one irrelevant almost-‘fact’? No, I simply asked you if you meant one of two possible other words (because, as noted, your favouring of fantasy over accuracy, combined with your choice of an unusual word unknown to me, led to very reasonable conclusion - that you might be wrong).

So when you say:
"where you [del]were wrong[/del] about the [del]facts[/del]
You actually mean
"where I used an unconventional word and you asked if I meant something else. Wow, what a super stupid poopyhead you are, I found one word you didn’t know. Everything else you say must be wrong. Super wrong!"*

*I’m willing to bet there’s at least one more, you should go look for it.

Your dishonesty is a product of your ideology, which is itself dishonest.

322

I’m sorry that you’re disappointed with your C-, Jack, but your grade reflects the quality of your work, not the amount of time and effort you put into it.

323

You don’t have any ideas, my bitter, pompous friend. You’re the tax the rest of us pay for having ideas. You’re the kid who interrupted the teacher to demand an acknowledgment that all of this is “just theories” and declared victory while the rest of the class rolled its collective eyes and moved on. Everybody else has already thought about everything you’ve posted, before you posted it, and determined that: it is stupid. You’ll get there too someday.

Of fucking course I don’t want to talk “ideas” with you at this point. You don’t have anything. The first interaction we had was me asking you to explain one of your “ideas” and you shucked and jived and told me to “do my homework” and dropped some rhetorical questions like shitty smoke bombs that didn’t mask your getaway, as if everyone else would forget what you said if you did, because that’s all you are - a counterpuncher with no hands. If you’d wanted to talk “ideas,” it would have happened already. But you don’t, because you can’t, because you didn’t get any of those from the shitty blogs you read by shitty people who want to sell you shitty e-books about who you are before you notice who they are.

You want someone else to say something of substance so you can pick and tear at the corners for a week, because you think it’s a secret that you don’t understand any of it, and you think you can keep it a secret by making irrelevant analogies for three paragraphs and dropping some insults ripped from the headlines of young adult television drama, and doing it over and over. You got ignored in the other thread once that became clear, so you came here, where I’m not obliged to ignore you, and I can tell you you’re stupid.

So that’s what I’m doing now, stupid.

324

You sure told him! And because saying something makes it true, it must be true.

325

Let’s make a list of all the other words **Jack **probably doesn’t know. I’ll go first: he probably doesn’t know the word projection.

326

He doesn’t appear to know the definition of the word feminist.

327

He doesn’t appear to know the definition of the word definition.

(And no bets regarding his knowledge of the word word.)

328

You just identified 99% of his problem (speaking only of the anti-feminist thread. I suspect that in a broader context he has much bigger problems).

329

Am I being unfair here, or does he also lack basic reading comprehension?

Legal analysis of the Owen Laurie rape case

330

Naita! Ixnay on the inuslay or ackjay will have more ordsway.

331

Awww. But I was hoping they’d do a haiku on pronouns. But I feel the good LK confirmed my suspicion. I don’t think he even understands his own posts when he reads them again.

332

So many perfidious females, so many opportunities to bemoan their ignominious natures.

333

Based on the anti-feminism thread, I’d say he lacks not only reading comprehension but writing comprehension.

334

Again?

The worst part is Linus K never even has a thesis in his posts, they’re just vague questions so he never has to state his position. Even when he’s disagreeing, he posts 99% in vagaries. It’s not even the anti-feminism that gets me at this point, it’s that Buzzfeed lists have more of a thesis than his posts.

335

Well, he’s deigned to say this much:

Quote:
Originally Posted by LinusK
Although feminists generally align with liberals, when you look beneath the hood they are at heart authoritarians.
Honestly, when I saw the thread start I groaned.

336

I posted in a thread started by **LinusK **once.

Once. I’m not making that mistake again.

337

It’s fascinating, in an extremely annoying way - it seems almost like having a racist white person holding forth on what it means to be a black person. “I’m an anti feminist; let me tell you what a feminist really thinks.” it doesn’t matter how feminists enter his threads to explain their own views; clearly he knows better!

338

Also, it’s DNA’s fault.

339

We’ve had GD posters who were crazier and/or more hostile than LinusK, but I think he may actually be the single worst debater we’ve ever had in that forum. I’m not sure he’d even pass a Turing test. A bot could probably do just as good a job of cutting and pasting material from anti-feminist websites, making grammatical but incoherent remarks, and ignoring everything that didn’t match up with its pre-existing “beliefs” (programming).

340

Yeah that’s the thing that really gets me about his threads–he simply doesn’t respond any time one of his factual claims is soundly refuted. It’s like he has added truth to his ignore list.