Lindsay, I’d just love to go through this point by point with you . . . but I don’t have that kind of time.
<My belief is that when a man looks for a mate, the first thing he is looking for is a hot body. It doesn’t matter what her IQ is or her beliefs on how best to solve world hunger or anything.>
Here I am officially stating my belief that A. you are not correct in this assertion and that B. When I look for a mate I’m not looking for someone with the body of a Greek goddess. I’ve met people who are physically attractive but they disgust me because they don’t know anything. I have several friends both online and off who aren’t very physically appealing but have beautiful personalities. And sometimes I get lucky and find both in the same person.
<Do you think for a minute that when a guy sees a babe he thinks how much he would like to discuss Shakespeare with her?>
Yes. I do. Some of the best conversations I’ve had with women I’ve known were on the philosophy and theory of existence. While that isn’t technically the answer to your question, I don’t look at someone and judge how good of a lay they’d be.
<No, he is thinking how long will it take to get her clothes off.>
Well, thank you for making a generalization about every single man on Earth. It’s nice to be told what I think. Now I can die happy.
<Tom says men don’t hear a word you are saying till they have had you.>
Well, then I’ve been listening to men all my life. I’ve heard and responded to a great many women. It’s delightful to talk to a good number of them. Some of them find talking to me delightful as well.
<My boss, who was a knockout, did not hire a girl for a job because the gal was also a looker. Great body, too. She told me to never hire anyone prettier than you are.>
Not that many people would care, but that is discrimination based on appearance. And it’s going against something I believe you stated earlier about physically appealing women getting whatever they want. I would appreciate it if you would make up your mind about something and not see-saw.
<Admit it, beauty is pleasing to the eye.>
Among other things, beauty is. Knowing that I’m talking to someone who isn’t the most physically beautiful woman in the world, but has a delightful personality is much better than talking to a knockout with toast for a personality.
<Ever notice that if a pretty, skinny gal is waiting for a taxi alongside a homely person, the pretty gal will get the
first offer?>
If you were a taxi driver and you saw someone physically appealing, would you think they had more or less money than a homely person? Hoping not to insult anyone here, taxi drivers are supposed to be concerned with few things other than making money and driving fast. This society teaches us that beauty pays, sometimes literally.
<Do you think there is something wrong with admitting that looks matter?>
I think one of the problems a lot of us are having is that you’re saying looks matter the most and that having physical attraction and nothing else will get you farther than being intelligent.
<It is true. By the by, the only women who complain about being homely are the ones who don’t get the treatment given to the beauties.>
Not true. I’ve known women who were models and quit because it was dreadfully boring. They also didn’t think they were much to look at. The most beautiful women I met were humble . . . they knew they were beautiful, but they didn’t act or think as if they deserved special treatment for someone thinking they looked better than most, or even some.
<Haven’t you seen those tests done with babies, they - young as they are - show a preference for the more attractive faces.>
I think you may be confusing attraction with contrast. Babies’ vision is not fully developed. They reach out for things that are clearly defined, and thus an “attractive” face, or one with lots of contrasts, is going to catch their attention more often than one that is “plain” or not full of contrast. Take a clas in developmental psychology and you should discover this if you pay attention.
<Why do you think Cindy Crawford gets paid to pose?>
Because there are people who feel she is attractive. Monica Lewinsky, who is not widely regarded as being attractive, got offered several hundred dollars to pose.
<It is because she is gorgeous.>
I disagree with you here. I don’t much like the way she looks, and I don’t think I’m alone here.
<There is absolutely nothing wrong with being superfical.>
I disagree with this statement so completely and fully that to try to express it any further would probably be a waste of time.
<Don’t feel that way, and I am not listening.>
So basically you’re saying that we should listen to your opinion, but we don’t get that courtesy back?
<Looks matter a great deal. Height matters too.>
To you they matter, obviously. To others, maybe not so much. By shutting yourself off from the views of others you make yourself out to be somewhat of an ignoramus.
<Taller men, the ones 6 feet and over, get paid more.>
To do what?
<What is so wrong with admitting that beauty matters, a lot? >
The fact that you seem to be intimating that it matters more than anything else.
<This is nothing to get angry about. It just is what it is.>
But it isn’t, which is why we are angry.
Apologies if I’ve unintentionally offended anyone. I am simply stating A. what I have found to be the truth, or B. my opinion.