:dubious: “Or”?
. . . I say, "Give me the motherfucking money, you motherfucking rat-bastard, or I’ll kill you!" :mad:
Because that’s the American Way. With potatoes.
God bless America! 
With potatoes.
Why not? If it’s good for whores and used furniture, it’s good for such less dignified things as political/op-ed links and C&Ps.
Ted Cruz thinks liberals are obsessed with sex.
Louie Gohmert hasn’t made an appearance for a couple of pages now, so here we go:
Mission accomplished.
So he was researching his family.
This stuff writes itself.
At least he wasn’t researching his brothers.
'cause being gay is bad.
Last year they tied funding for the courts to a number of policy changes that affect how the courts work (removing the Kansas Supreme Court’s authority to appoint chief justices and make budget allocations). A lawsuit has been filed alleging this is un-state-Constitutional, and that lawsuit is still pending[sup]1[/sup]. And this year, the state legislature is once more tying funding for the judiciary to their possibly un-Constitutional laws on selecting state judges. This places the Shawnee District Court in the enviable position of declaring the law constitutional and retaining funding, or declaring it un-constitutional and losing all funding for the judiciary.
[sup]1[/sup]The Kansas State Constitution says “The supreme court shall have general administrative authority over all the courts in this state.”
. . . Why? What would be the point of that?
4 of the justices (out of 7) happen to have been appointed by a Democratic governor. One assumes this has to do with that.
I don’t know. The republicans are saying it’s to create more local control over courts. The democrats are saying it’s an attempt to force the courts to do what the (vast majority) republicans in the state legislature want, and there are hints in the articles I’ve seen that it’s payback for the courts forcing the legislature to spend more money on public education which, as we all know, is anathema to many in the republican party.
“What’s education ever done for us?”
19 kids and counting!
Dan Savage, while expressing sorrow at the molestation, has also pointed out the irony of how Duggar and the FRC had repeatedly accused him of being a danger to children.
In Salem, NH yesterday:
Arrogance is thinking that you know better than 97% of the people who are actually educated in the subject.
Quick, somebody ask him about vaccines!
He’s got a point. It’s arrogant as hell to dismiss my views on phlogiston out of hand like I’m some kind of ignoramus. Teach the phlogiston controversy, people ! Redox is a lie from Satan !
I’m thinking that the “intellectual arrogance” thing is the new talking point, since the “I’m not a scientist” thing was roundly met with derision. I suspect that this one will meet with a similar lack of success.
Next up: “I have a secret plan for removing the carbon from the atmosphere.” (With apologies to Richard Nixon.)