The free market does not apply to Commie solar energy. Except the Russians are now our best friends.
So confusing to be a Republican these days. They need to hold three contradictory thoughts in their head before breakfast.
The free market does not apply to Commie solar energy. Except the Russians are now our best friends.
So confusing to be a Republican these days. They need to hold three contradictory thoughts in their head before breakfast.
GOP has BPD.
Borderline? I’d say full-on.
I know this is a joke–
–but sadly, cities lack the [del]ability[/del] constitutional authority to override state governments.
Speaking of which, I have been intrigued by the apparent lull in mainstream Republican anti-Iran rhetoric lately. On the campaign trail Trump banged on about “dismantling” the Iran nuclear deal as his “number one priority”, and his administration still seems to hew to that. But Republicans in general, now that Iran is in close military cooperation with our new BFF Russia, appear to have adopted a more realistic view, at least relatively.
General James “Actually-Quite-Sane-By-Comparison Dog” Mattis in fact went on record contradicting Trump about the Iran deal:
I apologize for contaminating this thread with a Republican idea that’s actually quite intelligent, namely Mattis’s realpolitik moderation, but I guess there’s enough stupid Republican idea floating around in its general vicinity to qualify on a technicality.
[Trump spokesbot] “It’s not a broken promise if he’s not sworn in yet. Why do you care anyway? Why don’t you want to talk about Clinton and her Foundation? And Benghazi? Her emails were read by somebody but the dishonest media won’t talk about it!”[Trump spokebot/]
It’s still a stupid Republican idea that when a Democrat President thinks of it, it’s the worse thing evah, but once he’s out of office, suddenly it’s not such a bad idea.
You could peruse the thread before posting in it, you little pig.
The Feds could ban the States from banning Cities from banning stuff.
eschereal, sorry. Please give me the post number. Again, sorry.
LePage :#32249 (your WaPo piece was mostly a rehash of LePage’s history – who wants to look at more of that?)
and
ESA: #32253 (right above a post of yours)
My friends and I have an inaugural predictions contest going on. One of mine is that Trump will tweet a picture of Obama’s 2009 inaugural crowd and claim that it’s his and that the lying media won’t admit he got more than 2 million people cheering for him.
To add to this, due to the cheap(unpaid for), shoddy Photoshop job done by the newest intern, either some of the Obama signs/2009 signs will not be fully altered or will be missed.
And/or.
Pictures of celebrity/political attendees will include at least one who has since died.
Will his black guy be there?
Can I steal those addendums? I think I could get extra points!
Go right ahead.
Loser Donald’s latest idea; military parades through the streets of DC and New York.