Stupid Republican idea of the day

Or maybe Biden can just light up a Tiparillo, and we’ll save the hoagie for a Chris Christie speech.

This is about about stopping abortions, not having healthy babies.

Chris Christie is their best chance guy and they hate him.

That’s hauntingly familiar…as if the GOP just played out that same scenario…

We desperately need to have unwanted, malformed children being born out of wedlock to crack mamas. It has a heartbeat! Birth it, and God’s will be done.

What? Care for the child? Provide medical care, food, and a home?

Woah. God says birth the child, not take care of it afterward. Mommy can handle it in between hooking and snorting coke. I hear such positions are lucrative.

So should Democrats. Don’t let him fool you; he’s still a twisted, malicious Republican who denigrates poor Americans as “takers.”

Plus, turning down the Federal government’s incredibly generous offer to fund most of a new Hudson River train tunnel is something New Jersey is really going to regret for years. Bartelby the Scrivener wouldn’t have said “I’d rather not” to that deal.

“I would prefer not to.”

Can’t believe I still remember that.

And another right-winger chooses politics over people:

“Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker says no to federal Medicaid expansion”

That link was HuffPo. Here’s the local story.

Dammit. Normally, I’d have double-checked that, but I was running out to pick up some food and didn’t want to get distracted by three hours of aimlessly following Wikipedia links.

Or the fact that scientists can now create beating heart muscle from stem cells in petri dishes? Will scientists be charged with murder for disposing of those cells, too?

There are no words.

That’s disgusting, offensive, and idiotic, and I really want to see it.

The “idiotic” part:

Either somebody needs to brush up on vocabulary or the filmmaker was offering a sophmoric implication about Mrs. Clinton’s anatomy. (I suspect the latter.)

The “disgusting, offensive” part:

“We don’t need no stinkin’ sexshuul harassment laws, because freedumb!”

Conclusion: You know you’ve gone too far when Dick Armey thinks you’ve breached the bonds of taste.

Chris Christie is a giant, gaping asshole, who just happened to say some nice things about Obama when he needed his help.

Which doesn’t refute the original assertion that he’s the best they’ve got.

Well, of course, because so many ‘Pubs wring their hands and weep over the fate of stem cells and zygotes–unless they’re actually born, in which case they may become leeches on society depending on their parents’ status.

NC lawmaker: Women should ‘duct tape’ nipples to stay out of jail
*
"North Carolina Republican state Rep. Tim Moore says that women can protect themselves from a new law that makes baring female breasts illegal by simply applying duct tape to their nipples.

On Wednesday, the state House Judiciary Committee C approved House Bill 34, which makes it a Class H felony to purposefully expose ‘private parts’ for the ‘purpose of arousing or gratifying sexual desire.’

The bill expands the state’s definition of ‘private parts’ to include a woman’s ‘nipple, or any portion of the areola.’"*

::SMDH::

Here’s the bill in question. I was a bit confused by the article (how would criminalising exposing nipples for the purpose of sexual gratification stop topless protests?) but I see there are different sections addressing each issue.

Wow. At first I thought you’d linked to The Onion. Unlike much of the recent nonsense, I see that this bill is expected to pass.

Give them a little credit, though. If the woman can prove her exposure was not for the “purpose of arousing or gratifying sexual desire,” then the penalty is reduced to just 30 days in jail.

Hmm. I’m sure many women feel that Tim Moore would get out of their bad graces if he simply applied duct tape to his balls and pubic hair.