Stupid Republican idea of the day

Not that this will make you feel better, but Texans quest for independence was a sign of things to come. They fought for independence to preserve slavery. The Mexican government OTOH, had outlawed it. We note the results. (Peter Grayson’s withdrawal from the campaign is definitely shows you the rough and tumble world of Texas politics).

It’s always worth celebrating defeating you enemies–especially when they can’t fight back. But the reality is gay marriage is coming to Texas. They, the Texas GOP know this, and when it happens they’ll weep and gnash their teeth for a day, and then find some other innocent group to hate and exploit. So consider it a faux celebration for a law that will soon be no more.

Sen. Inhofe (R-Loonybin) says a snowball is proof there is no climate change (originally posted by Yogosoth).

Scroll down a bit to see the epic smackdown by Sen. Whitehouse (D-Saneville).

Except for the fact that all of the employees will stay on the job without pay, the Coast Guard would technically get shut down, the air traffic safety people would not do their jobs, the Secret Service would not do its job. FEMA would shut down, Customs, Immigration and Naturalization, Border Patrol would all shut down.

But putting all that stuff under a single huge agency was a good idea, not a stupid one.

But not death by other means, like when Missouri Governor Mel Carnahan won election to the Senate in 2000, 38 days after dying in a plane crash.

GD-material point.

Top GOP operative calls Scott Walker ‘kind of a dumba**’

Salter was a key adviser to John McCain during the 2008 campaign.

It says something about you when a “key adviser” to one of the more inept campaigns since Dukakis — or perhaps McGovern — makes such a comment. Something reeeeeeeally unsettling (provided you have the political brains Og gave mayonnaise).

Sheesh, it’s NOT A COMPETITION, PEOPLE!

Oh, waitaminute; yeah, it is.

In a way, it’s a shame this thread exists. As tiresome as it would be, Republican malfeasance deserves the full blast of sunlight. Keep it all in one thread mutes the full scope of their awfulness.

Johhny L.A. started a thread about this but it also deserves a spot in this thread.

Uninsured Ex-Sheriff Who Fought O-care Struggles To Pay Medical Bills

He still doesn’t get it.

Well, he might have gotten better.

Yep, ridin’ into the dawn of Montana. We can point and laugh when they get tangled up in all the dental floss.

Yippy-Ty-O-Ty-Ay! :slight_smile:

Mark Halperin is, according to his Wikipedia page, "the senior political analyst for Time magazine, Time.com, and MSNBC and serves as a board member on the New Hampshire Institute of Politics at Saint Anselm College. "

Halperin has produced a piece for Bloomberg, in which he grades the main speakers at CPAC 2015. He assigns each speaker a grade for Style, a grade for Substance, and an Overall grade. His system demonstrates not only a complete lack of familiarity with basic mathematical concepts, but also a rather illuminating window into what people like Halperin consider to be important in evaluating a candidate.

Here are some of his grades. See if you can spot any problems here.

Scott Walker

[INDENT]Style: A-
Substance: C+
Overall: A

Jeb Bush

Style: A-
Substance: B
Overall: A-

Rand Paul

Style: B
Substance: B
Overall: A-

Carly Fiorina

Style: A-
Substance: C-
Overall: A-

Ted Cruz

Style: B+
Substance: C
Overall: B+[/INDENT]

Many of my students would love to be Scott Walker. Get an A- on one exam, and a C+ on the other, and end up with an overall grade of A for the course. Same for all the other folks listed here. As Halperin gets further down the list, to speakers like Rick Perry, Ben Carson, John Bolton, and Sarah Palin, the math begins to improve.

The fact that the overall grade tracks so much more closely with Style than with Substance is also rather telling.

Maybe when you grade Republicans, you have to do it on a generous curve. :slight_smile:

And what’s the best garment in the world for hiding assault weapons? A burqah!

I see it as the American equivalent ofthis competition.

AP story on the Walker thing says that the UW asked him to change the sexual assault reporting policy. Is this a poorly written piece? Why has the university system not been asking for this for years, or decades?

[/INDENT]
How does B and B equals an overall of A- ? There’s some unskewing going on !

He’s* Rand Paul*. The total package is worth more than the sum of the parts.

intangibles