lswote, you just don’t get, do you? If you were mad at Shayna (who at the point that she posted that was not yet a member of the Hags), why didn’t you address Shayna? Your comment addressed all of us!
Also, you do not understand the membership qualifications. You said:
No. Membership in the Hags is granted to anyone who applies and is qualified. Where was it “continually denoted that the qualification for entry was that they had dealt with” a particular poster?
lswote, why don’t you take this last chance to be a gentleman, and take yourself out of this discussion? You have a chance to save face here: don’t reply!
p.s.The questions posted above were rhetorical. There is no need to answer them.
Iswote, If You can’t handle some heat, maybe you should go to an AOL chat room or something.
People here are opinionated, and express themselves. Your insults can’t hurt me, though I resent the fact that others here have not reached the level of not giving a rats ass that I have. And If I’ve hurt you (to quote Fonze) Ayyyy!
First of all, how can one be hurt by something untrue? If it is true, and it hurts you, then do something about it! Even If I wasn’t the beautiful and confidant blueslady that I am, telling me I was fat or ugly wouldn’t hurt. Those are physical attributes of which most of us have little control. What we do have control over is our selves, how we treat those we meet, that the world is a little better for our having been there. People are like mirrors, and they tend to reflect the way you treat them. If you want to lash out at me, at least make it funny or witty don’t be such a bore. Most of my remarks are general, if the shoe fits…get it?
Also when you crash a party and show your ass, someone is going to kick it, it’s the law!
By the way, Aha was thrown a barb by the master himself and took it as a complement, look you got more attention (though negitive)from more women than would probably give you the time of day in RL! Take your marbles and go home for godsake! The first one to use the word “Putz” in reference to Iswote
Yeah, that pretty much sums it up. I appreciated the intelligence of the people here that I generally didn’t find in the people I talked with in chat rooms.
But I was unprepared for the heat I have taken the last few days. I expected more argument and less criticism.
Woo Hoo! I am honored and privileged to have been accepted as a Sexy Hag. Thank you Madam Grand Pubah Green Been!
And lswote, I apologize if you were hurt that I called you a putz. Perhaps if you weren’t a putz, I wouldn’t have called you one.
Interesting how I got more of a reaction out of you when I was less than complimentary than I did when I was being nice and supportive of you. That alone tells me exactly what kind of attention you’re seeking. You truly are pathetic.
Damn, now I have to apologize for yet again pointing out the obvious because it’s gonna huwt your widdle feewings. I’m sorry, lswote. But what else can you expect from a Hag on the rag?
Listen, lscrote, you whiny bastard, haven’t you ever heard of the Golden Rule? You know, do unto others as you’d have others do unto you? You call us hags on the rags, you should be prepared to get criticism right back.
Fucking wanker. Stop being such a pissant and shut your trap. You had the backbone to start this whole thing, and now you’re all hurt. Well, sorry, but it doesn’t work that way. If lscrote makes an asinine generalized comment about a large group of people based on the actions of a couple of them, then lscrote should be prepared to take the heat from a good portion of the group who feels that they were unfairly targeted. Unprepared, my ass. You’re probably jerking off to this right now. This is probably the best you’ve gotten from women in months, you weaselly little infant. Grow the fuck up, dickweed.
Ogre/Urge/Iswote - You remember when you sent me that e-mail after you were banned and I suggested that you wait a little while then come back and try again without the victim attitude?
Just wanted to point out a problem a biographer might face in describing a gathering of this esteemed group. What are you: Possible terms might include:
· A Haggis
· NaggingRagHags are us
· A Haggle (plausible)
· Knitting circle
I suggest this important subject be the first order of business – after you’ve all complimented each other on the nice desserts you brought along.
Hmm, Drain Bead – may I compliment you on your correct and effective use of an English colloquialism.
I vote for NaggingRagHags are US!!!
I think this group has the balls to take it and laugh!!!
And I agree with all of you about the Putz. If you ignore him long enough, he will go away, although not nearly soon enough. And I went out of my way on his pity-party thread to give him advice from my own rather painful experience, including the offer of private Email and got NOTHING!!! I just refuse to see his posts anymore…nuf said.
I vote for a haggis of Hags. “A haggis of Hags gathered today in front of City Hall…”
Our T-shirts can read “Nagging Hags on the Rag.” After all, you ain’t been nagged 'til you’ve been nagged by a Hag on the rag.
What should we put on the Hag flag?
Ohmigod! I just realized that we need another category! What if Esprix, Otto, matt_mcl, and SqrlCub want to join? The new category shall be known as Fag Hags.
I think they would be called "Hag Fags"
But we need them! How else can we decorate, dress or accessorize!
:eek:I am a gay man trapped in the body of a woman by the way
sexy? Who decided I was sexy? I don’t Want to be sexy(at least not to you, the selection committee).
Please re classify me as cute or whatever.
Thanks!
London Calling needs to be an honorary something. This is a must. A debut like the the one in Coldfire’s May 1945 thread, then the guts to step in to this thread, with brilliant suggestions like that? London Calling, you rock. You completely rock!
I’m kinda partial to “haggle,” myself. And who brought the tomato aspic? It’s delicious.
I understand that geese can be quite vicious when the occasion calls. And they make a lot of noise – with or without wine. There is (it would seem) a certain symmetry between ‘a gaggle of geese’ and ‘a haggle of hags’. Think that might get my vote.
aenea, didn’t thank you for your compliment on that flouncing thing, cheers – very appreciated. How do, Christie, cheers to you, also.
If the organisation requires an international man of mystery for overseas representation (baptism’s, weddings, copyright, trademark and ‘haggling’ issues my speciality), I’d be pleased to put my name forward…
And please remember, it was the goose who got the gander. Quack.
