OK all you short guys out there! If you’re 5’1" or shorter and fighting the urge to fuck a 12 year old, suffer no more! It’s alright, you won’t go to jail! Now get out there and shag a 6th grader and feel better about the world! Hell, choke a 2 year old on you cock&goo, prison would be dangerous for you so all that will happen is 4 months with a radio collar at worst. Hell, why not work it into a bank robbery? You can knock off the local Wells Fargo, take a Kindergartener out of the lobby on the way to the getaway car and take her home, tie her up and ride it till you get tired! There’s no danger of losing your personal freedom, you’re too short to go to the big house …WHERE SOME FUCKING JUSTICE MIGHT JUST GET DONE TO YOU!!!
If prisons are unsafe for some kinds of prisoners, then that’s a problem with how the prison is run. After all, it’s not legal for prisoners to assault other prisoners, even if they’re doing time for under-age sex. Perhaps something needs to be done to make prisons safer for all prisoners.
I agree, we must consider the prisoner’s safety at all times. If his height puts him in danger from the other inmates (who have, I am told, a tendency to beat up child rapists- God knows why) we should consider that when sentencing. Therefore, I propose that the inmate in question serve out his ten-year prison sentence in a federal supermax, where the 23-hour-a-day solitary confinement and complete seperation from every other human being for the entirety of his incarceration should remove him from any danger of height-based persecution (or, for that matter, child-molestor persecution). And everyone’s happy! (Well, everyone who matters)
It’s less obscene than it is ignorant. People are sentenced to prison, they aren’t sentenced to abuse or rape. At least not in the US, and we here like to pretend we are better than countries that DO allow such punishments.
That said, the munchkin should do serious time in short person’s prison or get put in solitary for his own protection.
I have an idea. I expect the average height in a female prison is closer to his own. He would be about average there. Let’s send him to a women’s prison.
:dubious: Yes, because sending a sex offender to a woman’s prison (presumably in the hope he will be castrated) is a stunning example both of good judgement and of the much-vaunted American justice system.
I was merely suggesting something more reasonable than setting the babyfucker free to hunt down my daughters.
But you’re right…I should just butt out and let the courts decide. That’s where the wisdom in this country lies anyhow. All the way to the top court in the land.
:eek: I didn’t read Inigo’s comment about the women’s prison that way at all. I figured that the women would, on average, have less of a height and weight advantage over him, so they might be less likely to assault him.
Sorry Anne. The Happy Clam divined my true meaning. Whether or not I feel that violence is the best remedy for this piece of shit (the short guy, not Clam) my meaning there implied a hope that women might actualy be harder on him than men would. It’s the whole conflict between counterproductive “eye for an eye” bloodlust and genuine desire to make the best of a bad situation in an effort to improve the human condition. Trust me, I’d be just as outraged if he were thrown naked into the prison yard with “Child Molester” tattooed on his shaven head. But I don’t think sending him back amongst the peoples with some clear instructions about whom he should and should not fuck is a sensible answer. At all.
If only prisons had some way of seperating high-risk inmates from the general population. Next a very tall man will try claim he’s being discriminated against if he’s sent to prison.