yup…real nice. i would thank you if you were reading this post, but since you are acting like adults(hey look, i used sarcasm…im learning bad habits from you) and ignoring my posts i guess i dont have to thank you at all.
bj0rn
yup…real nice. i would thank you if you were reading this post, but since you are acting like adults(hey look, i used sarcasm…im learning bad habits from you) and ignoring my posts i guess i dont have to thank you at all.
bj0rn
Coldfire
“You know how complex women are”
Yue Han, could ya do me a favor and let me know where you went to grade school? I’d like to make sure my kids never go there since they obviously don’t know how to teach basic reading comprehension.
1st: I never said I didn’t enjoy the “let’s meet IRL” threads, I simply made fun of them.
2nd: I never said I plan to stay in the pit, I said I enjoyed it. If I said I liked Disneyland, that doesn’t mean I’m locking myself up in Cinderella’s castle.
3rd: I never said I was offended by the “death to him” remark, I simply responded to it.
Wally:
Isn’t that what the pit is for, to be an obnoxious pain-in-the-ass flaming idiot? I haven’t been polluting the other boards like Gen Questions or Great Debates with this bullshit, and wouldn’t think of it.
I don’t know what to make of being called obnoxious in the BBQ pit. Does that mean I’m doing something right, or doing something wrong?
Technically, the Pit is for carrying on heated debates when they get too hot for the other forums.
Of late, it gets used a lot for calling out trolls and running fuck-off contests.
Just because it’s the Pit does not mean that every post needs to be a flame, though there are a select few who are really good at it.
Being branded a troll your first time out isn’t the kiss of death or anything, it’s just easier to work your way in if you start off in one of the other forums.
“ChrisCTP-…the sweetheart of the SDMB…” --Diane
Chris’ Homepage: Domestic Bliss
Look, Dingus, I didn’t say that the “Death to you” specifically was what offended you. But so far you’ve posted only in the Pit (that I’ve seen), and then gotten defensive when you were flamed in return. Proper “ettiquitte” would be to flame back, not accuse everyone of having no sense of humor.
Yes, it is. But if the only place you post is to the Pit, you look like you really are an obnoxious pain-in-the-ass flaming-idiot, and not just blowing off steam.
–John
Wow.
Just when I thought we had a challenger to bj0rn’s throne as Supreme Pain in the Ass of the Highest Order, he comes right back with yet another crushing blow to comprehension.
Way to go, bj0rn.
The IQ of a group is equal to the IQ of the dumbest member divided by the number of people in the group.
quite true. and its quite boring im afraid. the pit is a place for debates where its all right to call someone stupid or daft(or similar words in that category). but just plain assault on ones being is quite another matter.
i have noticed that a few individuals have resulted to “fuck-off contests” when somebody didnt accept their logic(and some have even started the contest before they expressed(!) any logic at all). i cant imagine people can have fun making fun of other people. at least if its anything more than just a casual joke.
well anyhows(intended)…enjoy your evening. or whatever the time of day might be when you read this.
bj0rn
If you’re referring to me, my dearest bj0rnito, I suggest you drag your language-butchering ass out of the Pit for ten minutes and check out some other threads.
BTW, I think the word you’re grasping at is “resorted.”
The IQ of a group is equal to the IQ of the dumbest member divided by the number of people in the group.
The best thing about having bj0rn in the Pit is that he’s self-basting.
If bj0rn were not real you wd certainly have to invent him… I simply don’t understand what the problem is that you lot seem to have with him… I think he’s really great: at least he’s not predictable - apart from the layout - and he can certainly keep his temper and maintain a civilised tone better than quite a lot of you
(sorry, bj0rn, I’m writing past you, which is not very polite…)
Actually, I have far more of a problem with the self-opinionated / self-appointed, of whom there seem to be a disproportionate number - oh, hello, Rouss…
As a European, I have to say that bj0rn may not always speak for me, but neither does Coldfire - we are not all wetting ourselves to be little mock-Americans - or Wankies, as I believe I may have heard them called
And now I have stayed up far too late AGAIN - I must go to bed
I sense blood will be spilled between Durnovarianus and Coldfire.
I can’t really say that I take offense to this, because I don’t really know what “self-opinionated” means. Did you make that word up? It would seem to mean “I bestowed opinions unto myself.” Thanks, I guess. “Self-appointed?” I am equally confused here. Wait a second…
Wait…makes up words…misuses the real ones (layout?)…misspellings…defending bj0rn…attacking Coldfire and myself…
Gee, I wonder if Durnovarianus is bj0rn??
The IQ of a group is equal to the IQ of the dumbest member divided by the number of people in the group.
Dunno said:
" As a European, I have to say that bj0rn may not always speak for me, but neither does Coldfire "
OK. This clearly means that Dunno sometimes does not agree with me. Which is fine. Or did I miss something ?
" - we are not all wetting ourselves to be little mock-Americans - or Wankies, as I believe I may have heard them called "
Mock-Americans as in people who like to make fun of Americans, such as, say, bj0rn ? No, we Europeans do not all fit THAT profile, that’s for sure… but what are you saying ? That I am ? Or that I am, like you, NOT compatible with the mock-Americans defintion you provided ?
Coldfire
“You know how complex women are”
well this is interesting. thank you Durnovarianus for your kind words. sometimes i wonder if people are incapable of doing something like this, but you proved me wrong
Rousseau: verði þér að góðu
i had no trouble understanding what Durnovarianus said. but you a native speaker(correct me if im wrong there)can not comprehend it. if you can insert words that would suit much better than the words used, great! but shut the bloody well up about it sigh. im not harrassing you for bad icelandic(this is a far fetched shot, if you dont understand it, ignore it).
hey, ho…coldfire! where did you come up with that one?? me…mocking wankers or -ies?
i did not! (here you insert “yes you did” and back it up with some quotes to which i reply: “no unprovoked mockings there…all in the spirit of the pit :)”)
have a nice day
bj0rn
Coldfire
“You know how complex women are”
Excuse me, I don’t mean to hijack, but as I stated in the “Confessions of a Troll” thread, I am Dingle, he is Dingus. Please do not confuse the two or assume I am an alter ego. I’m a nice person, with nice posts (just a touch of road rage) who doesn’t want to be associated with this seemingly unpopular person. And since I’m nice, I will now leave the Pit.
Back to the topic at hand. Thank you for your time.
you know, i saw a silly thing once. i guess you have all seen it so let me be brief.
there is this guy who blames his monitor for his computers mistakes. and boy oh boy, in this age of microsofts windows 9x i bloody well wish it was true. long live ignorance because with knowledge we realize how ignorant we are.
im not a case-sensitive person, just thank heavens i like spaces!
Huh?
OH HO! Did I just hear bj0rnito, of all people, affront MY ability to comprehend English? “SELF-OPINIONATED” IS NOT A WORD. I suppose “Self-appointed” is technically a word, but I really don’t see how it fits in this context. Apparently I “appointed myself.” To what, I do not know.
Apparently, bj0rn, you have just now discovered the magic of compound words, but you don’t quite have a grasp on the concept yet. As for other words that could be substituted, I s’pose “brilliant,” “studley,” “dashing,” or “heroic” could be used.
And for your information, bj0rn, Coldfire was blaming his monitor for your mistakes. So I s’pose the “ignorance” that you are referring to would be your own. If this is true, then it is the first sensible thing that you have said so far.
But as for the unintelligable:
This makes more sense to me than a good deal of your English posts. Go figure.
The IQ of a group is equal to the IQ of the dumbest member divided by the number of people in the group.