Who will be Trump's running mate? (J. D. Vance Has Been Chosen)

The media continue to have fun with the couch story:

But not just the couch story. That article also details pretty much all the actual baggage Vance comes with (as already discussed above).

So Vance continues to pull focus from Donald and his attacks on Kamala in a very, very bad way, leaving the option of replacing him (which will also look very bad) with someone who will also pull focus from Donald by virtue of being second-choice.

Thanks for posting that article. It mentioned this little bit:

I read that. How did he respond to that comment?

Dunno. Haven’t seen the CNN article referred to.

Here is a link to the transcript.

The pertinent part:

COLLINS: OK. So, you agree that people, who break in, and vandalize a building should be prosecuted?

VANCE: Exactly. COLLINS: OK. I’m just checking because you did help raise money for people who did so on January 6th, which was impeding an official proceeding, breaking into a building that they weren’t allowed to be in, and vandalizing the Capitol.

VANCE: Well, Kaitlan, I know that this is the obsession of the national media to talk about what happened two years ago, three years ago, on January the 6th, as opposed to talk about the future.

COLLINS: It’s not an obsession. I’m just seeing if it’s a double standard.

VANCE: No. Let me – no, let me – let me answer the question, Kaitlan. I mean, look, here’s my – been my basic argue about January the 6th. If you beat up a cop, of course, you deserve to go to prison. If you violated the law, you should suffer the consequences.

But there are people, who protested on January the 6th, who have had the complete weight of the Justice Department thrown at them, when at worst, they’re accused of misdemeanors. Now, again, there are people who are accused of worst offenses, and that’s a problem.

But you can’t have Black Lives Matter protesters, who rioted and vandalized goes free, when you have people, who were actually peacefully protesting, on January the 6th, who have the book thrown at them. That’s the double standard that I’m most worried about.

That and the fact that not only were they the wrong color, they weren’t rioting to help Dear Leader but rather had their own agenda.

I never hear the fascists use numbers. How many Jan. 6 rioters have been convicted? Of those, how many “had the book thrown at them” for something minor and are now facing an unjust sentence?

Bonus question: How many times have I heard Democrats defend what Republicans call “BLM rioters” by saying, “Well, what about the Jan. 6 rioters?” My answer: zero. Rioters, looters, etc., should be caught and punished.

I hear Vance went furniture shopping- he wants a new couch for an occasional piece.

Quoting Vance:

Every single accusation from the right is a fucking confession.

The reality is that people actually peacefully protesting during the George Floyd protests had the book (and occasionally tear gas, pepper spray and rubber bullets) thrown at them, while Vance wants the J6 protestors who rioted and vandalized to go free.

Apparently storming the U.S. Capitol is “peacefully protesting.”

Yes, peacefully protesting is rioting and rioting is peacefully protesting in MAGAland.

Before the Senate, Obama was in the Illinois state legislature, and before that, he was a community organizer. As the quote went when he was running against Romney, “Remember, Jesus was a community organizer. Pontius Pilate was a governor.”

Extra bonus: A lot of the BLM rioters were the same folks as the January 6 rioters. Hell’s Angels, the Proud Boys, and the Minneapolis Police Department are not left-wing groups.

I was reading an interview with his wife talking about the Secret Service which made me curious about his code name. It is apparently Bobcat, which was his school mascot but strikes me as amusing because of the cat lady thing. (Trump is of course still Mogul and Harris is Pioneer).

Vance is wrong again-

BLM Protesters Facing Felony Charges a Year After Uprisings

Pleas: Approximately 718 individuals have pleaded guilty to a variety of federal charges, many of whom faced or will face incarceration at sentencing. Approximately 213 have pleaded guilty to felonies. Another 505 have pleaded guilty to misdemeanors.… * 139 individuals have been found guilty at contested trials, including 3 who were found guilty in the Superior Court of the District of Columbia. Another 32 individuals have been convicted following an agreed-upon set of facts. 76 of these 171 defendants were found guilty of assaulting, resisting, or impeding officers and/or obstructing officers during a civil disorder, which are felony offenses, including one who has been sentenced to more than 14 years in prison.

District of Columbia | Three Years Since the Jan. 6 Attack on the Capitol.

Yeah, he should just take a seat, oh wait…

Define “take”.

“Do you, JD, take this seat …”

Any ideas on how the Democratic VP choice will impact Trump’s decision on whether to push out Vance?

My first thought is that Gabby Giffords’s high profile would trigger him to pick a woman if Harris anoints Kelly. And I’m thinking that he’d stay pat if Harris picks Walz, since conservative vs. progressive, and officer vs. enlisted man, would sound to Trump like a good matchup. Other ideas?

(There is another threat for who Harris will pick. I thought this thread would be good for how it will affect Trump’s final decision on a veep, and hope I was right.)

Weren’t both Walz and Vance enlisted men?

Yes, I believe so.