The operative term, as well you know, was “just.” As in “merely.” As in “You are merely tolerated. Not liked.”
And you know exactly why. It’s not because of your views, at least not entirely. It’s because you like to act like a jerk.
I agree. I find it hard to believe that anyone would be willing to engage in sexual congress with a troll like you.
Did Lobohan call you a troll? Where?
Case in point. “Troll” doesn’t always have to mean “person who posts views he does not hold for the purpose of eliciting a negative response.” It can also mean “generally repulsive and pestilential entity.”
For the purposes of clarification, that’s the sense I intended in post 157.
So? That’s same as I feel about you, Lobohan and many others. Yaaaawwwwwnnnnn.
Yeah, right. Like if I agreed with you on all the issues you wouldn’t be trying to include me in your circle jerk. :rolleyes: If you actually believe this bullshit you just typed you have even more serious issues than I thought you had.
And it might interest you to know that I get PMs complimenting me. People, some of whom you’d recognize, support me—and my views—but just don’t want to put themselves in the line of fire. But you tell me that you and Lobohan and a bunch other of the more prolific asses, don’t like me and I’m supposed to somehow feel bad. Maybe in your fucked up world that’s how it works, but not in mine.
[quote=“kaylasdad99, post:183, topic:728054”]
Did Lobohan call you a troll? Where?
Case in point. “Troll” doesn’t always have to mean “person who posts views he does not hold for the purpose of eliciting a negative response.” It can also mean “generally repulsive and pestilential entity.”/QUOTE]
Oops, I see he didn’t. He came to your defense. My mistake. And I apologize to Lobohan (Ugh.) for calling him a liar. Thanks for bringing that to my attention.
Fucking hilarious. You douches on the left love doing this shit. You pick a word that has power because of what it means and use it as a weapon the way a monkey would wield a chainsaw. But when called on it, it’s “Well, I didn’t really mean that. I was using the word to mean something else.” Yep. Something that could have been, and should have been, expressed with a different word or phrase. But you rejected that course of action because you wanted the power of the stronger word. So, by “troll” you really didn’t mean “troll” as it is commonly understood, but you decided to use it anyway. And when you can’t defend the accusation you slither and claim that you were using some double-secret meaning of the word.
Sprout a fucking backbone, for chrissakes.
You’re doing a very good job of demonstrating my point.
You’re acting like an asshole, and you know you’re acting like an asshole, and you’re doing it on purpose. I certainly don’t expect–or want–you to feel bad, but I would expect you to own it.
If by acting like an asshole you mean that I’m happy to let you know that I don’t give a fuck what you think about me, then say that. I think you and quite of few others on this board are fucked up in the head and are assholes. Not that that matters really, I’m sure the feeling is mutual. But you seem to think that I should care because since you have numbers on your side that you must be right.
Grow the fuck up.
Big deal, so do I, but I do know that also real scientists have done so. And also more respected posters too.
But what has to be mentioned is that the subject here is Trump, even Republicans that are conservative do think the support some are showing to Trump is only demonstrates that those followers are indeed going to even more darker sides.
Fine that you are willing to demonstrate to independents, moderated republicans and even conservatives(!) what they are facing here. (Indeed, it is not just the left as you misguidedly think)
So as XT told another Trump follower:
Huh? My exchange with the piss ants was not about Trump or his politics.
Now, I am happy to say that I’m glad he’s in the race and that, at the very least, he’s brought to the fore the illegal immigration issue. Would he make a good President? I don’t know. And guess what, you don’t know either. He’s clearly a very competent guy, but who knows how those skill might translate over to governance. He might be fantastic. He might be the worst president we’ve ever had.
And what are these “darker sides” you mention. Is it more of the ridiculous exaggerations you mentioned in another thread, about the lack of concern for legal hispanic immigrants? If so, we can simply ignore them. If it’s something else, please do share.
I was not born yesterday pendejo, The subject of Trump and the racist OP did lift your nativist instincts.
And the other point stands, you are actually following fringe ideas that already in this tread many conservative Republicans on the SDMB do not agree with.
If you are talking about growing up, the arrested development seen on you is in part caused by ignoring advice from fellow republicans.
As I pointed many times before, besides not being able to identify good sources, you can not help but to come to the “aid” of racists, stupid posters and pendejo candidates.
Had I meant that, I would have said that.
I really don’t care one way or the other whether you give a fuck. You know you can come across as a jerk, and you do it on purpose.
:shrug: OK. I absolutely cop to being an asshole sometimes. And to doing it on purpose, sometimes. I troll sometimes, too.
Not sure where you get the “fucked up in the head” part, but whatevs.
I don’t think you’re “fucked up in the head” (although I do at least know that’s not a Dx in the DSM-5). I do think you often come across as a jerk and you seem to enjoy it.
That’s incorrect. I don’t think you should care about my opinion of you. I think it’s a good idea to be aware of how you come across, if only to be able to hone your asshole skills.
Like, f’rinstance, knowing that I appear “fucked up in the head” to you gives me useful data about my posting style. If I choose to be an asshole to you in the future, I’ll know where I’m starting from.
This is also incorrect. I’m sorry you feel outnumbered and ganged-up on. That sucks. I don’t believe I’m in the right because others may agree with me, but I totally get how a pile-on can get one’s hackles all the way up.
Sure. Tell me what we need to do, and we’ll do it together.
I tried to calculate magellan’s bullshit-to-wisdom ratio but the divide-by-zero crashed my computer.
Oh, bullshit. I chose that word because I thought I’d restrain my impulse to descend into profanity.
But have it your way, you idiot. Please consider posts 157 and 183 as withdrawn and inoperative. I shall begin again:
Happy?
You inadvertently entered his IQ in the equation.
I’m not sure that, “I get a lot of PMs from people who are afraid to be associated with me in public,” is all that great a defense.
If such people exist, the temptation to hold them in a comparable amount of contempt is strong. Seriously, they’re too chickenshit to express their views openly?
Unless they’re trolling magellan and he’s too dumb to see it, which I could totally buy.
All introduced legislation is “not outlandish?”
Seems to me there was a constitutional amendment proposed which would have recognized Jesus Christ as Lord and Master over the United States. Not outlandish?
Not this one. As explained in detail here.
To get back to the OP, it seems more and more people would likely vote for Donald Trump the more that time goes by. According to a new CNN/ORC poll, Trump’s approval rating among Republicans and Republican-leaning independents in almost 80% and he’s pulled within 6 percentage points of Hillary Clinton in polling for the general election.