I agree. I see no reason to lynch **Koldanar **at this time. FWIW, I believe both LUTHA claimants.
Once again, my case against **Zeriel **.
On Day8 Zeriel first voted for **Khameleon **when he (Khameleon) insinuated a power role. Then, when **Khameleon **claimed mason, **Zeriel ** unvoted and switched to Cygnus. He made no other contributions yesterday and none toDay. He has never followed-up on his previous questions for **Johnny Bravo ** or Plumpudding.
**Vote Zeriel **
Maybe wait and see if he gets modkilled?
Yeah, I get that, but where did the claim of*** only*** two come from?
Possibly. Somehow I expect the barely playing Scum players will all show up again and play just enough. So far it has just been Town getting modkilled.
Good point. So if he gets mod killed killed, then he’s town and we shouldn;t have lynched him. If he escapes modkill, then we lynch him…? (not really a super serious plan)
wE just had two pop in after a warning- one claimed LUTHA what are your thoughts on Raventhief - given your theorie?
My opinion on Koldanar hasn’t changed. I think he’s cult. I also think he edited his role PM. Sinjin’s BACKGROUND does match the Deacons, so that tracks, but look at Sinjin’s POWERS description - short and to the point.
When I first brought up the discrepancies in the wording of Koldanar’s POWERS description, the idea was floated that perhaps the cult was written up by a different mod than all the others. But Koldanar’s POWERS description is inconsistent even within the cult. Either it’s edited, or a mod did him a grave disservice by giving him the only role in the game with a fluffy POWERS description.
Elsewhere, I’m glad that townies have been agreeing with me about the claiming. I was beginning to the think that I was an insane person.
FOS Texcat and FOS Lightfoot for pushing back hard against narrowing down the scum pool.
I would also like Lightfoot to respond to post #49 because I have a serious problem with the way she characterized my proposal.
Meanwhile:
NETA: Not the only fluffy role, but the one with far and away more color than anybody else.
NETA on that: POWERS, not role. Okay, I’m done for now.
I can see where that might seem squirrelly, but one (maybe two) points. I went out of town last week, which i mentioned. I got back Saturday and was knackered. So I just couldn’t muster the energy to get re-involved.
Second point - I’m Town. No reason for you to believe that, and I was put on notice, but I don’t want yet another Townie to get modkilled, bringing our numbers down again.
So even though i suck, I am studying the game again, looking for someone that looks like scum to me.
The tinkerer powers description is fairly fluffy too, so I don’t think its a huge deal.
Yes, however, note how even the tinkerer powers description leads off with a fairly mundane description and then gets to the fluff. That’s the style for all of the powers roles - they start with minimal fluff and then get to the silliness (if there is any).
The tinkerer role does have the “ordinary light of day” bit, but I still think Koldanar’s claim doesn’t match up. I went through all of this in a lot more detail when I first brought up the discrepancies. I don’t remember exactly where it is atm.
Ya know, this is a really good example of my issue with you. You say that’s “just” Pleonast going back to our D1 argument. And? I was replying that my issue went beyond you calling out Meeko for posting in the wrong thread, and cited Pleo’s reference to that. See below for relevant exchanges, in order.
How is relevant that the issue was also discussed D2? That doesn’t refute my statement that I took issue with it D6. So yes, I voted you after you answered a question, and yes, I took issue in a later Day with something you said in an earlier Day. This is not exactly a “Let bygones be bygones” kind of game. Why are you trying so hard in this game to spin things that are a totally normal course of the game, into something nefarious? (You know, like Meeko accidentally posting the above post into N0 instead of D1. Sure, that’s where you started doing it, but you haven’t stopped yet.)
Did I miss where this was ever addressed by Biotop?
Yeah, he said he did nothing, which is what I saw.
I have no case against **Raventhief **at this time.
My case against **Zeriel **is not mainly based on low level of play, but on his provable misrepresentation of the reason for his vote on Professor Pepperwinkle and his failure to follow through on his other comments.
Post #22.
I was curious how Biotop saw it- with their comment.
<ducks head> sorry.
My point is that you’re calling me out for a stuff that happened on D1 and D2, which is fine and fair game, but you’re also stopping there. When you said you “also took issue with [me] in D6,” you’re making it sound like you had taken issue with something I’d done somewhere between D2 and D6, but you really hadn’t. All you were doing was eating off of that same meal as before. And you’re talking about mountains and molehills?
It’s not nefarious; it’s lazy. There have been many, many hundreds of posts since them, and a good number of them were by me. Dig deeper and give me something to respond to that hasn’t already been hashed to death and back again. I really have no intention of going back to the Meeko N0 post or the comparative benefits of talking/not talking at night, except to say that I still believe everything I posted.