nongoog is either a troll or an imbecile

[Omegaman]

[QUOTE=eleanorigby]
Dangerosa–well said. I don’t villify her more than the soon to be ex. But they both knew what they were doing was wrong.
Omegaman–not to be mean or anything, but the more you try to explain, the more my head hurts. It sounds vaguely like you’re stalking askeptic on the bb to me. And what does, “I save mine just like my love” mean? Does that mean you save your hate just like your love? What does that even mean?
[/QUOTE]

What is it with you ? Don’t I make myself clear to you ? You really don’t understand anything I say , do you ? I can see your hate , you wear it on your sleeve like some great badge of honor for all to see and admire. Is the same way you wear your love? If so I don’t see it. Does anyone else? Do you give away your love ? I don’t give away my hate. I used to, then my role in this world became much more clear. Spreading hate is what I used to do. Do you think your pen is mightier than your sword ? Lets hope not. Because your words let the whole world see your very soul. I suppose you cannot understand this either. Keep spreading your hate. It will be with you until your last breath. I hope you and it are very happy together. Ask askeptic if he feels stalked. We are humans walking this earth defining ourselves by our words and deeds. I have seen your words and the poison they carry. As he attacks I defend. What say you of your deeds? Do the carry they same poison as your words ?

[Omegaman]

[QUOTE=Miller]
He could make a hat, or a brooch, or a pterodactyl…
[/QUOTE]

Well I think I’d make a fine wheel chock. The very best one in the world.

[wonky]

[QUOTE=Omegaman]
What is it with you ? Don’t I make myself clear to you ? You really don’t understand anything I say , do you ? I can see your hate , you wear it on your sleeve like some great badge of honor for all to see and admire.
[/QUOTE]

We all take turns shining her badge of hate, and buffing it to a warm glow.

I like to use lemon-scent Pledge.

[Brainiac4]

[QUOTE=Dangerosa]
In the end, it shouldn’t matter if Selma Hayak does the dance of the seven veils in front of my husband and says “take me, now!”
[/QUOTE]

In the event of that rather unlikely scenario coming to pass, your husband would ask Ms. Hayek her position on threesomes, and refer her to you for further arrangements. He would, however, mention his own willingness to participate, should the other parties be so inclined.

[Morbo]

[QUOTE=Omegaman]
then my role in this world became much more clear.
[/QUOTE]

Relentlessly spamming every SDMB thread with your confounding sideshow until we forget which OPs we’re even reading b/c they all become inescapably about you?

[samclem]

[QUOTE=Omegaman]
I’m pretty sure Dio doesn’t know what to make of me either but I just know he is going to teach me something I need to learn in the worst way .
[/QUOTE]
Damn! You’re more perceptive than I’ve given you credit for. Dio will certainly teach you in the worst way. Backslider.

[fisha]

[QUOTE=Omegaman]
Well I think I’d make a fine wheel chock. The very best one in the world.
[/QUOTE]

Our very own religious randomizer. Now with new and improved obfuscation.

Or one of those flashbacks they promised are finally coming to fruition, 20 years later.

[wring]

one other thing, she claims that no one else at work knows about the affair. anyone keeping track of the number of delusions? Obviously the wife knows, and she undoubtably knows others at work, the husband knows, and , well, you really think he wouldn’t let something out? not to mention the object of the OP herself, who seems to not really have a good handle on that whole ‘what others think’ thing, among other issues.

[Heckity]

Dangerosa gave you some great advice. As another holder of a foolish past, let me expand on the theme a little bit. I’m guessing you had a difficult childhood. Perhaps you were sexually abused when younger - as I was. Sadly a biproduct of that abuse was defining myself as having only one attribute - my sexuality.

Attention from men, coupled with extremely low self esteem, meant that my only validation early on was when those rich and powerful men turned their attention to me. I was wined and dined, taken on trips, made to feel powerful myself. It almost seems too rudimentary to point out that those moments were hollow.

You do seem to have a pattern nongoog. You feel powerful and special when you have men turn from another to choose you. They are a prize that you’ve won and while you likely don’t worry much whether you’ve stolen a man from marital path or another woman, your allure and the proof of it is heady.

You are young. Others may have made considerable inroads toward future success at your age - but you are emotionally stunted and don’t have time to work on things.

Try very hard to understand - really understand, that you are bright and blessed in more ways than your looks. Look around for some nice guy who makes you laugh and will think the world of you, but simply isn’t brave enough to approach you right now. You are sending out signals that get you what you think you want - but trust me, in time you’ll see . . . if you are using them and they are using you - with what are you left?

You claim not to want our sympathy and yet I feel incredibly sorry for you. You have a long haul ahead of you and many lessons to learn the hard way. I hope your lessons come soon -

[Dangerosa]

[QUOTE=wring]
one other thing, she claims that no one else at work knows about the affair. anyone keeping track of the number of delusions? Obviously the wife knows, and she undoubtably knows others at work, the husband knows, and , well, you really think he wouldn’t let something out? not to mention the object of the OP herself, who seems to not really have a good handle on that whole ‘what others think’ thing, among other issues.
[/QUOTE]

Another example of his stupidity. He’s apparently on the “society circuit” and when he wants to take his secretary on a romantic date, chooses the opera! No wonder the wife is pissed. That may be worse for her than any sexual infidelity.

[catsix]

askeptic said:
Come on, you don’t consider an older married man in a position of authority who has sex with a female subordinant to be victimizing her?

I think the little tramp was trying to get ahead any way she could, and if that meant giving head, she was fine by it. The only thing she feels sorry about is that her scam has come to an end.

Did you miss the part about how she had been unemployed for a long time previously and really needed the job? You don’t think that fact played a part in her sleeping with the guy?

I’m sure she saw an opportunity she could seize. Here’s a job opening she could guarantee she wins by making it plan that she’ll fuck the boss.

There have been sexual harrasment laws on the books for years just to prevent people from doing exactly what this guy did.

I don’t for a minute think that she’s anything beyond a conniving bitch who uses sex to get what she wants from older men who currently prize her for her youth. She’s going to keep using the hell out of it too until she’s too old to be interesting to middle-aged men.

Lord Ashtar said:
She’s a whore, a slut, and a gold digger*. She deserves all the hostility she’s gotten thus far and then some.

*To be fair, she may not actually be a gold digger. But she sure ain’t messin’ with no broke nigga.

Considering that one of her chief complaints regarding her last rich, older boyfriend was that he didn’t buy her anything for xmas, I think ‘gold digger’ is pretty appropriate.

She is not, however, a slut. A slut just enjoys sex and has sex with whomever she wishes, whenever she wishes. A whore uses sex to get things for herself.

nongoog said:
That wasn’t a ploy for sympathy, it was some context so maybe people can try to understand that I’m not some selfish jezebel bent on sexual gratification to the detriment of other people’s relationships.

It’s pretty clear that the sex isn’t about sexual gratification. It’s about what kind of gifitication it can get you. You use sex to get things out of men. A gift, a job, a trip to the opera, whatever it may be, sex is what you barter to get your bling bling.

The whole boyfriend-xmas-gift saga combined with this i-needed-a-job-and-knew-i-could-get-it-by-using-my-twat story cements it.

I think it’s pretty much all about the financial gain for you, no matter who it harms.

Next you’ll be trying to sue the guy for victimizing you.

[twickster]

Jesus, catsix, I know you pride yourself on being the biggest bitch on the Dope – but what possible purpose is served in reviving this almsot-dead thread just to spew this bile? You’re not exactly saying anything new here, though you did manage to say it far more profanely than most of nongoog’s other critics.

[eleanorigby]

[QUOTE=jsgoddess]
We all take turns shining her badge of hate, and buffing it to a warm glow.

I like to use lemon-scent Pledge.
[/QUOTE]

Thank you, jsgoddess–that’s the nicest thing anyone’s said to me all day!

Omegaman–but, no. Why bother?

[Klaatu]

[QUOTE=twickster]
Jesus, catsix, I know you pride yourself on being the biggest bitch on the Dope – but what possible purpose is served in reviving this almsot-dead thread just to spew this bile? You’re not exactly saying anything new here, though you did manage to say it far more profanely than most of nongoog’s other critics.
[/QUOTE]

Who the fuck are you to give catsix shit for posting in a Pit thread? Are you taking over for QG? Why does a “purpose” need to be served?

You Pit nannies are irritating.

[Brainiac4]

[QUOTE=Klaatu]
Who the fuck are you to give catsix shit for posting in a Pit thread? Are you taking over for QG? Why does a “purpose” need to be served?

You Pit nannies are irritating.
[/QUOTE]

**Twickster **isn’t being a Pit nanny, s/he’s being a human being. Catsix’s post didn’t add shit-all to the discussion, and deserves criticism. Go back and read Twickster’s post again; it isn’t a QG “you people are all meanies” kind of post, it’s a “why are you being such a bitch” post. More than a little difference.

[Princhester]

[QUOTE=catsix]
I think the little tramp was trying to get ahead any way she could, and if that meant giving head, she was fine by it. The only thing she feels sorry about is that her scam has come to an end.

I’m sure she saw an opportunity she could seize. Here’s a job opening she could guarantee she wins by making it plan that she’ll fuck the boss.

I don’t for a minute think that she’s anything beyond a conniving bitch who uses sex to get what she wants from older men who currently prize her for her youth. She’s going to keep using the hell out of it too until she’s too old to be interesting to middle-aged men.

Considering that one of her chief complaints regarding her last rich, older boyfriend was that he didn’t buy her anything for xmas, I think ‘gold digger’ is pretty appropriate.

She is not, however, a slut. A slut just enjoys sex and has sex with whomever she wishes, whenever she wishes. A whore uses sex to get things for herself.

It’s pretty clear that the sex isn’t about sexual gratification. It’s about what kind of gifitication it can get you. You use sex to get things out of men. A gift, a job, a trip to the opera, whatever it may be, sex is what you barter to get your bling bling.

The whole boyfriend-xmas-gift saga combined with this i-needed-a-job-and-knew-i-could-get-it-by-using-my-twat story cements it.

I think it’s pretty much all about the financial gain for you, no matter who it harms.

Next you’ll be trying to sue the guy for victimizing you.
[/QUOTE]

You bring the wood, I’m sure someone else can bring the matches and other necessary accoutrements. A black pointy hat to jam down on her head would perhaps complete the picture.

Or you and others could perhaps just gather round in a big mob and kick **nongoog ** to death. You could use great big hyperbolic boots. See if you can’t do it with as much justice as a mob in Texas.

I don’t have too many nice things to say about **nongoog **. I have none to say about you. You are an A grade bullying hyperbolic piece of shit.

[Heffalump_and_Roo]

Well, I don’t have much to add here either. But I did want to say this. I’m on the fence about this.

From someone who has made lots of mistakes and is still making lots of mistakes, I don’t feel that I have the right to judge anyone else. And I’m trying not to be judgmental. And I didn’t have a dog in this fight to begin with. I’m more irked by people that are squeezing out emotional validation unfairly. nongoog hasn’t had a lot of people agreeing with her, so that hasn’t happened here.

But nongoog’s flippant attitude about the whole thing does grate a bit. And it’s tough not to get upset by the defensiveness here. So I’m not sure which way I want to go on this.

[TokyoBayer]

[QUOTE=twickster]
Jesus, catsix, I know you pride yourself on being the biggest bitch on the Dope – but what possible purpose is served in reviving this almsot-dead thread just to spew this bile? You’re not exactly saying anything new here, though you did manage to say it far more profanely than most of nongoog’s other critics.
[/QUOTE]
It looks like s/he posted about three hours after the previous poster. Prey tell how this is reviving a thread? Is there some sort of cut-off of 2.5 hours that I’m not aware of?

[Chimera]

[QUOTE=Heffalump and Roo]
I’m on the fence about this.
[/QUOTE]

Why, the only thing worse than a Threadshitter is a Fencesitter.

Get the rope boys, we’re going after Heffalump and Roo next!

[catsix]

twickster said:
Jesus, catsix, I know you pride yourself on being the biggest bitch on the Dope – but what possible purpose is served in reviving this almsot-dead thread just to spew this bile?

So when a thread is still on the first page, and it’s been posted to within the last three hours, that’s ‘reviving an almost dead thread’?

I think you need to calm down.

Or hey, you could always pit me for ‘reviving’ these ‘almost dead threads’ that have gone a shocking three hours without a post.

I’d love to see you explain why you are now the arbiter of when a thread is dead.