Now, I could be wrong here … but I think it has something to do with the “being a giant creepy freak” part.
So, let me translate:
This person has desires and beliefs that do not jive with my personal value system.
This is a bad person who deserves derision, persecution, and should be baited and mocked.
Is that about right? :rolleyes:
It’s Friday afternoon, so let’s wrap up Reductionism 101:
“Yes, because I mock people who have views I find repugnant, I believe all people who are different from me in any way should be derided and persecuted, and I admit I’m worse than Hitler.”
Are we done now?
Oh, ho ho ho, and Godwin’s law, you’re so hilarious. Maybe instead you could explain how my post is in any way incorrect in the context of this thread?
You’re totally right, though. We should go find this guy and make him marry a black feminist corporate bigwig who used to have a penis. That’ll show him! Ignorance fought, great job team!
This is a dating site where people get to express what they want in their mate. Who are you to presume that his decision is incorrect?
Yeah, that’s about the size of it.
Bonus when the desires and beliefs that do no jive with mine border on the sociopathic and psychotic … but maybe that’s just me.
Has to be, I think, or someone genuinely bonkers-in-the-nut, with verbal diarrhoea
A few other posters already did it. Knowing what you want is fine. This guy sounds like a breakdown waiting to happen. We’ve already noted that he says he doesn’t want to even bother meeting a woman if she has to pee more than once during a date or needs a drink during a seven mile walk - or if she’d ever consider questioning or disobeying him.
Just … wow.
This is in the section about how he will respond to solicitations based on his writeup. I suspect it similarly applies to how he will treat the prospective partner in the real world.
Okay.
Are you worried that he’ll lure in some helpless young lass who doesn’t yet know how to read, or what?
This guy is obviously a little…off when it comes to his relationships. According to you or me, anyways. I’m sure there’s a few fundamental Christians who might agree. Most certainly I find his viewpoints ridiculous. However, I’m okay with people engaging in consensual acts that I might find objectionable.
Because they’re, you know, his personal beliefs, and my personal beliefs. And projecting the latter onto the former would make me a gigantic douchebag, and a hypocrite besides.
Sorry, I meant about the drinking specifically, yes. I would think water would be an absolutely must. At least, for me it would. Walking, I have no problem with. I walk all the time. But not without water. It’s not about dehydration-I just tend to get very thirsty very quickly-whatever I’m doing. In fact, I’m thirsty now.
(Sorry, I mixed up the divorcee with the divorcé-that and I can’t figure out how to do the accent marks)
Interconnected Series of Tubes, because the guy’s a misogynistic control freak? Because being married to him would be like being in prison?
People shouldn’t be allowed to be misogynistic control freaks?
ETA: Sorry, I’ll try to condense my posts and stop spewing short ones across this thread. I just find this entire dialogue very surprising and revealing.
Oh for the love of…you know what, never mind.
:rolleyes:
(That isn’t YOUR personal ad, is it?)
Jibe not jive. And yes this person deserves more derision than I can handle. He sounds like a complete asshole. Go for it! He seems like a real keeper.
Oh, it’s not incorrect. It’s just stupid. And highly mockable.
Of course they are. And other people are allowed to point at them and laugh, and use them as educational tools for the edification of their children and such.
Allowed to be? That’s your bugaboo? Whether or not we should have him arrested for being a big giant creepy misogynistic control freak?
If that’s what’s got your undies in a knot, then I’m on your side. No. He should not go to prison for being one of the biggest fuck-knuckles on the net.
But why in the name of Fred Garvin shouldn’t we mock him for it?
Sure, they’re allowed to be as mysoginistic, controlling and freakish as they like, so long as they’re doing so with other consenting adults and aren’t hurting anyone in the process.
I also reserve the right to hold them up as shining examples of how NOT to write a personal ad on the internet, lest ye also be ridiculed by the teeming masses (and lest ye remain single since the women you’re looking for may exist, but she sure as hell isn’t searching for love on teh interwebs).
“If you can’t be a good example then you’ll just have to be a horrible warning.”
-Jennifer Cruisie
Yes, because clearly if I don’t point and laugh with everybody else, I must be a simian woman-hating he-man. How long have you been posting here? I guess it isn’t a strawman if the argument’s unpopular.
Look - I’m not agreeing with this guy’s point of view. I’m not condoning it, I’m not sharing it. If he abused a woman I’d be the first person there, with Bengay and a pair of hedge trimmers. So far, though, having read through this guy’s profile, what I see is a very fundamental, very religious, very conservative, very sexist creep. Who has in no way made any kind of attempt to disguise his desires and expectations of the person he wants to marry. Would you direct the same vitriol towards a woman who wants to be a quiet, submissive, religious SAHM? They do exist, you know.
What the fuck business is it of yours who he wants to date?
That’s right. Someone dragged you into this thread and forced you to agree with everyone else. Otherwise, it would have to have been, like, you marched in and started lecturing people, or something.
Did anyone make it all the way through the whole thing? My eyes started to glaze over at the bible passages. Guess I don’t pass the test 