Great analogy.
Is she actually turning a blind eye to lousy sex (i.e. having sex that is bad but overlooking it), or does the sexual excitement from novelty, romance, adventure, hope, and infatuation actually make the sex feel good, even if he is lousy at it? It seems to me that it would be the latter, but we need to hear from the ladies about this.
I do agree that people like to rationalize things to make them feel better about themselves. In this case, though, haven’t we established that women’s sex drive is different from men’s? Maybe not lower, but different. That is, men won’t get out of the mood for sex on a given night as easily as women will. If men’s sex drive, on average, is more impervious to distractions such as stress from work, an argument about who should take out the trash, etc, then isn’t that due to the biology of men and women?
I can’t speak for all guys, but in most cases it is not resentment. It is about trying to understand the underlying reasons for the reduction in sexual activity. It is about a guy trying to figure out the following: "We are both going through the same issues, we both face
- Practical: Kids, work, housework, being tired, lack of time, etc
- Emotional: Emotional connection declines, pissed of at the partner for a variety of reasons, etc
- Physical attraction: He/She let themselves go, put on weight, effects of aging, etc
- Sexual ability: “She gives the worst blowjobs”, “He is a selfish lover”, etc
and yet I still want to have sex with her but she doesn’t as often as she did."
I guess some guys assume that the problem is them, for being bad in bed, for being bad husbands, etc, and maybe these guys feel resentment for feeling like that. But I don’t think every guy who doesn’t get enough sex has resentment towards his wife/partner.
As for me, if it was just my case, I can figure out and enumerate reasons for the reduction, but that is not interesting. What is interesting is that millions of couples go through this, the majority I assume. What was interesting about this thread is that even high-libido women can be in sexless marriages for years. When the problem is that widespread it seems like a natural equilibrium for most couples.
We seem to be made to get into this state. In the beginning, with racing hormones, there is lots of sex and bonding. As time goes by, women’s and men’s physiologies conspire to reduce sexual activity. This must be evolutionarily advantageous, but it sucks for people in these relationships.
Even though we are hard-wired to get into this state most of the time, people look at their individual case and start to analyze the specifics of their case and find blame with themselves or their partner. It’s like throwing a loaded die, which is biased to almost always land on six, and every time we get a six, we think “Oh, this time it landed on six because I threw it wrong” or “This time it landed on six because I was distracted”. But the die is loaded. The most frequent result is six. Finding a reason behind each six is quite meaningless.

 Dangerosa:
 Dangerosa: gaffa:
 gaffa:
 cosmosdan:
 cosmosdan: MeanOldLady:
 MeanOldLady: Polerius:
 Polerius: Qadgop_the_Mercotan:
 Qadgop_the_Mercotan: filmore:
 filmore: overlyverbose:
 overlyverbose: